His plan was to retire the old depreciated obligations by borrowing new money at a lower interest rate.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.
I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.
I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.
On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.
Answer:
debt and economic depression
Explanation:
"America piled up a huge national debt during the Revolutionary War, but the Federal government was unable to collect taxes to pay off the debt."
Temperance is abstinence from alcoholic drink.
