Answer with Explanation:
Malaki ang maidudulot ng kabutihang panlahat sa lahat ng tao <em>kung ito'y pagtutuunan ng pansin. </em><u>Dito nakasalalay ang ating paraan ng pamumuhay. </u>Halimbawa ng kabutihang panlahat ay ang <em>karapatan makainom ng malinis na tubig.</em> Kung ang lahat ng tao ay may pagkakataong maka-inom ng malinis na tubig, <u><em>ito'y magdudulot ng matiwasay na pamumuhay</em></u><u> </u><u><em>dahil walang mag-aaway-away.</em></u><em> </em>
Malaki ang epekto ng kabutihang panlahat sa pagkakaisa ng mga tao. Dahil dito, ang bawat tao ay inaasahang tumulong sa kapwa upang mapabuti ang pamumuhay nang lahat. Natututo rin tayong hindi maging sakim sa mga materyal na bagay sa mundo at ibigay ang iba sa mga nangangailangan.
This question is missing the options. I've found them online. They are the following:
Question: In the above excerpt, which words best establish immediacy?
A) "White men have been known to encourage slaves to escape."
B) "… that I should be free."
C) "I pretended not to be interested in what they said."
D) There is no immediacy.
Answer:
The words that best establish immediacy are:
B) "… that I should be free."
Explanation:
<u>By definition, immediacy is the quality of creating excitement and a sense of urgency by involving someone instantly. Now, imagine being a slave and wishing nothing more than freedom. If someone told you to run away "...that [you] should be free," can you imagine how you would feel? The excitement this would bring? The urgency to escape and finally get rid of the cruelties done to you? For that reason, letter B is the best option. "...that I should be free" are the words that create a sense of immediacy.</u>
4. All of the Above. A good summary should have details.
Answer:
A. Non sequitur
Explanation:
Non Sequitur is a type of logical fallacy that forms a conclusion or response that is not logically connected to the previous statement.
From the example, <em><u>Ever since the new casino opened unemployment in this city has gotten out of control </u></em>, there is no logical connection between the increased unemployment in the city and the new casino.
There would have been a logical conclusion if the statement was written like this,
<em>People who are caught gambling are fired, so since the new casino opened, the unemployment in the city has gotten out of control.</em>
<em></em>
People who are caught gambling are fired is the premise and connects the next statements about unemployment rates increasing and the new casino in town.
Therefore, the logical fallacy that takes place is Non sequitur as it has no logical connection to the premise.
