Answer:
CBAs in criminology are usually part of an impact evaluation, which looks at how a new program affects outcomes for participants. Most applied criminology CBAs count the costs of new interventions, translate participant outcomes into dollars, and compare those costs and benefits to business as usual.
Explanation:
Early CBAs in criminology simply counted costs and benefits and compared them to each other, without considering whether there were alternative explanations for the results. Consider our successful treatment client. To put a value on his recovery, we need to know whether he would have been in prison or on the street without treatment. We also need to know how much of his recovery was due to the treatment. What else happened in his life between sentencing and the evening at the subway that might have affected his behavior? This process of developing an appropriate "counterfactual" is critical to generating rigorous CBA results.
Is this a true or false question?
If so, it's false. You can have gonorrhea even though there may not be any symptoms. Always check with your doctor for verification, if concerned.
This applies to many other medical diseases as well.
Answer:
<em>B. It’s a source where the author presents her interpretation of a topic</em>
Explanation:
A secondary source is a text that describes, summarizes, or discusses information on a primary source. B. is a perfect example of this.
Answer: 29 rulers
Detailed Explanation:
Rome had 29 different rulers between A.D. 180 and A.D. 284.
Answer:
Thomas Paine wrote Common Sense to convince the common people to support independence. ... Paine was unwilling to be reconciled with Britain because it brought war into the land. He was not an objective and unbiased reporter because he was going against the king.
Explanation:
