Answer:
B) -0.98
Step-by-step explanation:
Correlation coefficient is usually denoted with numbers ranging from 1 to -1. Automatically, this eliminates option C) as our possible answer, since -1.43 is outside the range.
The trend shown in the scatter plot describes a negative relationship because, as the values in the Y-axis decreases, the values at the X-axis increases. The possible correlation coefficient we are likely to get is one that is negative. This eliminates option A and option and option D is our possible correlation coefficient for the scatter plot given since both values are positive.
Option B) -0.98, best represents the correlation coefficient of the given scatter plot. Since the points on the scatter plot seem closely aligned on a straight line, a negative value if -0.98 is mostly the possible one to get.
Answer:
1194
Step-by-step explanation:
because 199 is the height of the first mountain so just times that number by 6 to get the second mountains height.
Answer:
A) There are no Counts
B) I'll count the number of each type of nut.
Step-by-step explanation:
A) Yes, the Chi-square is not an appropriate method because the question gave us the weight of the nuts in grams and these are not counts. Whereas, the chi-square goodness-of-fit test requires that the data values are counts.
B) What i will do instead is that i will count the number of each type of nut and assume that the given percentages are also relevant for each type of nut.
Answer:
688 is divisible by 8
the digit I have typed is 8
Step-by-step explanation:
please mark me as brainlest
Answer: if rounded like 68 18/100%
Step-by-step explanation:
