The Geneva Agreements were signed in July 1954. The French promised to withdraw their soldiers from northern Vietnam as part of the deal. So, option (B): "They officially ended French colonial rule in Southeast Asia" is the correct answer.
<h3>What impact did the Geneva Accords have on Asian independence movements?</h3>
The 1954 Geneva Accords were intended to bring peace and self-government to Vietnam after 75 years of French colonialism.
Vietnam would be temporarily divided at the 17th parallel, with elections to choose a president and reunite the country taking place within two years.
Check out the link below to learn more about Geneva Accords;
brainly.com/question/1293371
#SPJ1
Answer:
Authoritative parenting
Explanation:
According to Baumrind there are four types of parenting styles: authoritarian, authoritative, negligent, and permissive.
The authoritative parenting style tends to set clear expectations for the child along with adequate support and nurturing.
Reasons are given to the child for an expected behaviour. So the child tends to be disciplined and able to think for themselves even when the parents are not there.
Communication occurs constantly between the child and the parent.
The given scenario exemplifies this when Angela's parents express clearly what is expected from her and why. They are generally warm and supportive of her and do not hesitate to show her affection and respect. She generally behaves whether her parents are with her or not.
Negatively mostly. Although the march was a successful warfare maneuver, it destroyed all of Georgia's farms and infrastructures and when the war ended the country didn't have anything and had to be rebuilt. This was difficult since nobody could make money because the industry and the economy was dead.
1. false
2. true
3. true
4. true
5. false
“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>