Answer:
The answer is d: physically on the U.S. soil but considered to be outside U.S. commerce.
Explanation:
Foreign trade zones are areas within the United States or near a port of entry where foreign and domestic goods are deemed to be outside the U.S. trade. Tariffs and quotas are removed in foreign trade zones and new companies and foreign investments seem to be attracted by these areas, as the requirements for operating therein are not difficult to meet. These areas are under the U.S. Customs and Border Protection supervision.
The goods in foreign trade zones receive the same treatment by the US Customs as it were outside the commerce of the United States.
Answer:
The answer is "Hyperlocal applications and applications for benefit"
Explanation:
The term Journalists is derived form journalism, it is also known as a job to find, develop, advertise and rewrite news or content written and produced in the news outlet sources, journals or broadcasts.
- In this process, the hyperlocal method and benefits method is used, which covers important topics, and it also covers the local news.
- This process also explains its benefits and causes that occur, and it also provides its solution, that's why hyperlocal and benefits application is the correct to this question.
Answer: Deforestation and Wetland degradation
Explanation:
The two human impacts of human economic activity on the environment are as follows:
1. Deforestation: The Sub- Saharan Africa is occupied with scanty bushes and trees in the forest area. The climate is hot and dry. The removal of bushes and trees has resulted in deforestation and desertification in the region.
2. Wetland degradation: The discharge of agricultural drainage into the wetland has degraded the quality of water in the wetlands in Sub- Saharan Africa.
Answer: D. No, because the state owns and operates the metal plant.
Explanation:
The State owns and operates the plants and so is allowed to discriminate against non residents.
This principle was established by the United States Supreme Court in Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, 447 U.S. 429 (1980).
In the judgement, the Court held that South Dakota had a right to give it's residents preferential treatment in buying cement from a state owned plant.
