Answer:
d.) Jones is an incidental beneficiary and has no right to sue for Ace Construction's breach of the contract.
Explanation:
Jones was not a direct party to the contract, in fact, any profit which he was supposed to receive was incidental in nature and thus he cannot sue Ace Construction's breach of the contract.
Answer:
It will incur an Opportunity cost of $8,000.
Explanation:
It will incur the opportunity cost of $8000 because the additional unit produces by the company then the additional revenue that is generated will be equal to the amount (25 - 20) x 12,000 = 60,000. Since the additional cost, that incurs for the production of 12000 units is 52000. Therefore the profit earned is $8000.
So if the company does not produce it then it will lose the profit of $8000.
Answer:
C. international strategy.
Explanation:
There are several business strategies been used different corporate to survive and grow in various business condition.
International strategy is one of the business strategies that involve the adaptation of foreign policies and selling goods and services at the International market with some local customization to the product. When a firm pursues an international strategy, the head office of the firm retains fairly tight control over marketing and product strategy. Each subsidiary of the company, which is spread all over the world has independent operations with the least interference from the parent company.
In the given case, Xerox had a monopoly on photocopier technologies as they are protected by strong patents, which is their international strategy.
Answer:
The correct answer is D.
Explanation:
Equity = $231,000
No. of outstanding shares = 5,000
Price of share = 
Price of share = $46.2
Repurchased shares worth $18,000
No. of shares repurchased = 
No. of shares repurchased = 390
When the shares would have been repurchased then the value of equity would decrease by the same amount.
Revised equity = $231,000 - $18,000
Revised equity = $213,000
No. of shares outstanding = 5,000 - 390
No. of shares outstanding = 4,610
Thus, the price of each share would be:
Share price = 
Share price = $42.60
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
