Nabokov organized his essay in an exceedingly typical manner; he states his plan then uses proof to support it. He additionally explains his read on what makes a decent author initial then what makes a decent reader. This is smart as a result of one should initial perceive the author before understanding the reader. He uses samples of what created a decent author to clarify what would create a decent reader. “The writer is the initial man to mop it and to form the natural objects it contains (…) The panting and happy reader, and there they spontaneously embrace and are linked forever if the book lasts forever.” This possibly implies that a good author makes a cheerful reader. so a cheerful reader is one that has understood the piece clearly, creating them a good reader. author then offers his definition of literature before closing the essay, giving the reader that last little bit of information that wraps literature, the reader, and also the author all at once, “To the story teller we turn for entertainment, for mental excitement of the simplest kind, for emotional participation,for the pleasure of traveling in some remote region in space or time.”
Jefferson had written a pamphlet called A Summary Review of the Rights of British America. It denied all parliamentary authority over America and argued that the ties to British monarchy were volunteering and not irrevocable. ( The answer is C. )
I tried to unscramble it and came out with relationships.
I hope this helps!
It
depicts the expectations of females and males. For example females
are expected to take care of everyone else, neglect their needs.
While the males are seemingly allowed to do whatever they desire,
have unchallenged confidence and say what they want.
<span>I
hope it helps, Regards. </span>
A: The book “the fault in our stars” made me look introspectively, and connect the character’s lives to my own. The character’s struggles with mortality and living life to the fullest made me reflect on my life and wonder if I am truly appreciating it and experiencing all life has to offer. I also made the connection between the author’s inability to answer Hazel’s questions about the book, and how there were no answers for the problems in Hazel’s life. She was frustrated that there was seemingly no reasoning behind the author’s writing, just like there was no reason she had cancer, or that she was in this situation. Her anger towards the author symbolized a deeper anger that she would never truly “have answers” and that her life would never truly be fulfilled because she was going to die at such a young age.
I didn’t exactly know if you meant meaningful connections within the story or meaningful connections to your person life but I hope this helped!
