The Anaconda Plan is the name applied to a U.S. Union Army outline strategy for suppressing the Confederacy at the beginning of the American Civil War.[1] Proposed by General-in-Chief Winfield Scott, the plan emphasized a Union blockade of the Southern ports, and called for an advance down the Mississippi River to cut the South in two. Because the blockade would be rather passive, it was widely derided by a vociferous faction of Union generals who wanted a more vigorous prosecution of the war, and who likened it to the coils of an anaconda suffocating its victim. The snake image caught on, giving the proposal its popular name.
In the early days of the Civil War, General-in-Chief Winfield Scott's proposed strategy for the war against the South had two prominent features: first, all ports in the seceding states were to be rigorously blockaded; second, a strong column of perhaps 80,000 men should use the Mississippi River as a highway to thrust completely through the Confederacy. A spearhead, a relatively small amphibious force of army troops transported by boats and supported by gunboats, should advance rapidly, capturing the Confederate positions down the river in sequence.
The main reason why President Roosevelt pushed Congress to insert "cash and carry" provisions into the Neutrality Acts was because he wanted to help Britain.
Akbar took the policy of religious toleration even further by breaking with conventional Islam. The Emperor proclaimed an entirely new state religion of 'God-ism' (Din-i-ilahi) - a jumble of Islamic, Hindu, Christian and Buddhist teaching with himself as deity. It never spread beyond his court and died when he did.
Answer:
Businesses refuse to hire workers who demand high wages
Explanation:
Karl Marx's belief in the economic system argued that capitalists do not give value to the workers and do not share profit with the labors or workers. The specialization of the labor force was decreasing and pushes wages down.
So, Karl Marx's predicted that if businesses refuse to hire workers with high wages according to their value, this can lead to revolution and can destroy or replace the free markets.
Hence, the correct answer is ". Businesses refuse to hire workers who demand high wages".
Hope this answer helps you :)
Have a great day
Mark brainliest
