1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leokris [45]
2 years ago
5

which state was the first to set the notion that a state had the right to nullify federal laws and secede from the north

History
1 answer:
gogolik [260]2 years ago
8 0

The state of South Carolina was the first to set the notion to nullify federal laws and secede from the north.

<h3>What regulation set way for the nullification?</h3>

In 1828, the ordinance of nullification was enacted by the state to declared the Tariffs created by federal law as null, void and not binding on the state, its officers or citizens.

However, President Jackson responded to the ordinance by asserting that the supremacy of the federal government is over the state declaraction.

Read more about nullification

<em>brainly.com/question/24527868</em>

You might be interested in
What advances did Mao Zedong's rule bring to China?
german
Mao Zedong was the famous communist leader of China who is known to many of his accomplishments. In his reign, he was able to unify the food production, trade, and transportation systems of China, in which the greatest was the depletion of political divisions in the country. 
7 0
3 years ago
Give me two examples of geographic representations others than a map
Katena32 [7]
Globes and satellite images.
7 0
3 years ago
The first battle at Bull Run (Manassas) convinced the Union Army they could defeat the Confederates.
Sophie [7]
No, it is false that first battle at Bull Run (Manassas) convinced the Union Army they could defeat the Confederates, since this battle ended with a Confederate Victory. 
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was the Atomic bond for Hiroshima justified? Why?
elena-s [515]
The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral – in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu.Jun 19, 2020
7 0
3 years ago
Help I suck at history
olga2289 [7]
I think the answer is A

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In which two ways did the Nazis use imprisoned Jews?
    8·2 answers
  • Which method for determining the age of artifacts measures the rate of decay in atoms in volcanic rock?
    10·1 answer
  • What might account for the rapid growth of the Christian population in the late 200s?
    9·1 answer
  • What is polytheism?
    5·2 answers
  • What Event prompted the Persian Gulf War
    8·2 answers
  • Which of these would most likely to be a patriot in the revolutionary war? Answers Below
    13·2 answers
  • Compared With Travel On Wagons, Travel On The Transcontinental Railroad Was ___?
    8·2 answers
  • What are some 3 different examples of HOW the North Korean government uses propaganda?
    7·1 answer
  • Did lincoln have the right to commit an act of war without congressional approval
    8·2 answers
  • Help pls I’ll give brainliest answer
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!