Answer:
Before a joint session of Congress on September 20, 2001, President Bush declared a new approach to foreign policy in response to 9/11: “Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated.” Bush declared that the United States considered any nation that supported terrorist groups a hostile regime. In his State of the Union speech in January 2002, President Bush called out an “Axis of Evil” consisting of North Korea, Iran, and Iraq, and he declared all a threat to American security. British and French allies did not receive Bush’s declaration enthusiastically because they believed Bush’s language to be overly aggressive.
These remarks later matured into the policies known as the Bush Doctrine, officially traceable to September 2002, when the White House released the National Security Strategy of the United States. The doctrine generally focused on three points. The first was preventive war in which the United States would strike an enemy nation or terrorist group before they had a chance to attack the United States. It focused on deterring any potential attacker. The second point was unilateral action in which the United States would act alone if necessary to defend itself either at home or abroad. The third point embraced spreading democracy and freedom around the world, focusing on concepts such as free markets, free trade, and individual liberty.
Reactions to the Bush Doctrine were mixed. Neoconservatives within and outside his administration strongly supported the idea of the United States acting on its own to ensure the country’s security and to protect the American people—preemptively, if necessary. Some opponents believed the doctrine was overly bellicose and its emphasis on preemptive war was unjust. Others believed the emphasis on spreading democracy around the world was naïve and unrealistic. As the situation in Iraq became increasingly unstable, the ideas behind the Bush Doctrine receded in prominence, even within the Bush administration.
Explanation:
https://millercenter.org/president/gwbush/foreign-affairs
press the link for more help
Answer: adaptability/flexibility
cooperation
dependability
concern for others
Explanation:
An actor refers to an individual who portrays a character in a performance. The job of an actor is to represent the character that they are playing as well as convince the audience that the character being portrayed is real.
According to O'NET, the common work styles needed by Actors include adaptability/flexibility, cooperation, dependability and concern for others.
Actors should be flexible and must be able to act in different roles. They should be dependable and show concern for others.
Answer:
D. outfitters
E. climbers
F. Sherpas
Explanation:
According to "The Value of a Sherpa Life," the groups that would be most angered if the guiding industry were shut down are the outfitters, the climbers, and Sherpas.
This is because, these three groups make their living through guiding and shutting down the industry would greatly affected them.
Probably means her presence is very welcomed when she’s around, and that’s she’s a real positive person all the time. Also that she’d probably be remembered as a good person if she would die.
Your answer is "why"
<em />
<em>‘wherefore’ is a bit more difficult because it could be confusing. In Renaissance English ‘wherefore’ meant ‘why.’ So Juliet is saying “Why are you Romeo?”</em>
