The answer should be D because the speech is talking about the Nazis being deceitful or of using deception. Basically stating they are going to do something but really turning around and doing something different in BENEFIT for THEMSELVES.
Answer:
Ethos, pathos and logos are used by Anna in her commentary by claiming her reference to what historians said about America, and how people faced discrimination and by stating facts about it.
Explanation:
"A Quilt of a Country" is a commentary written by Anna Quindlen, after the terror attacks of September 11, 2001. In her essay commentary, she had used the persuasive mode of Ethos (appeal to authority or character) by supporting her claim with reference to what historian Daniel Boorstin wrote about the nation of America. He says that the United States is the only country in the world which is not build on someone's image. And uses this statement to define that why she thinks that America is like so, because it was built like a quilt "bit-by-bit".
Then, she uses pathos (appeal to emotions) by stating that how America had faced many problems of discrimination but still stood as a one nation during the time of emergency.
And lastly, she used logos (appeal to logic) by stating facts and by giving references to historical occurrences in the US.
D. information citations throughout the paper.
The Works Cited page is the list of sources used in the research paper.
2. The whole Nazi environment probably aided to these Sonderkommandos becoming collaborators, from seeing everyone around you either fleed, killed or tortured is enough to make people to make choices like that. It was a live or die situation and under those circumstances, anything could happen.
3. Levi and Langer want us to see this situation from the Sonderkommandos point of view, where virtue and morality don't apply and the only choice is to kill/ follow the Nazi orders or be killed. They probably thought that by taking on this task there was a chance of survival.
4. The choices that we make help us to develope as person and in our personal identity, and in the absence of meaningful choices it can confuse us in our identities, and can lead us to make critical descisions.