Answer:
The maximum price that should be paid for one share of the company today is $54.895
Explanation:
The price of a stock that pays a dividend that grows at a constant rate forever can be calculated using the constant growth model of Dividend discount model (DDM) approach. The DDM values a stock based on the present value of the expected future dividends. The formula for price today under this model is,
P0 = D1 / r - g
Where,
- D1 is the expected dividend for the next period or D0 * (1+g)
- r is the required rate of return
- g is the growth rate in dividends
SO, the maximum that should be paid for this stock today is:
P0 = 2.2 * (1 + 0.048) / (0.09 - 0.048)
P0 = $54.895 rounded off to $54.90
Answer:
Stock Price is $98.70
Explanation:
given data
exercise price = $100 per share
call price = $25 per share
put price = $17 per share
mature time = 2 years
annual rate of interest = 5%
to find out
What is the stock price today
solution
we will use here Put Call Parity for find out Stock Price that is express as
C + 
= S + P .....................1
here C is call price and r is rate and t is time and S is Stock Price and P is put price so put all value in equation 1
C + = S + P
25 + 
= S + 17
solve it we get
P = $98.70
so Stock Price is $98.70
Answer:
Explanation:
The partnership agreement is silent about the payment of salaries and the division of profits and losses.
Profits should be divided based on capital invested by each
The capital investment by Gillie, Taft and Dall is 60000 : 120000 : 60000 Distribution has to be in ratio of 1:2:1
Total profits are 120,000, 1:2:1 ratio
The distribution will be Gillie $30,000, Taft $60,000 and Dall $30,000.
Answer:
c. The medical center will prevail based upon the written contract
Explanation:
Since they later signed a written contract where it is stated in paper and has their signature that the medical center could not assure nor take any responsibilities for the birth of a kid without any medical, mental or physical defects the medical center has the upperhand on the court, as well as they did in Scalisi et al. v. New York University Medical Center that promised a perfect designed baby, the Scalsi decided for invitro fertilization because of the wife´s family medical history and tendency to autism, and they ended up with a baby with autism, so they sue the New York University Medical center, but the court sided with the NYUMC because of the written contract where it stated that they couldn´t assure the baby to be born without any medica, mental or physical defects.
