You can find this awnser on the internet just copy and paste your question there
In March 1638, Anne Hutchinson was banished from Massachusetts Bay Colony, the reason was that she had become a spiritual leader and challenged male authority. She preached to both men and women, meaning she opposed the authority of the religious leaders of the Bay Colony. They accused her for heresy, as she critized the puritans beliefs. The real reason was that she indirectly questioned the stablished roles, as men were the only ones that could preach, therefore more women could rebel. Saying she had a direct rebelation from god and that she was able to interpret the scriptures was the final things that made it possible to them to excommunicate her.
1. B - It allows people the freedom to criticize public officials.
When the citizens had the freedom to cricitize its own government, the government would be forced to live up to a certain standard. This would dramatically reduce the complacency within the government body, and the government become more likely to listen and create legislations that satisfy the majority of people.
2. A. Journalists are entitled to cover trials
and
C. It is difficult for public officials to win libel cases.
Through this, the journalist could act as a middle man that connect what happen within the government body, transform it into pieces of information, and give it to the people so we can form our own opinion about it. Difficulties to win libel cases favours journalists because it allow them to criticize public officials without direct threat of of being sued for smearing their name.
Answer:
Both have three branches of government and a constitution. Neither use any for of direct democracy. Both have constitutions that are difficult to change
Please rate me and pick me as brainliest please
The goal was for <span>The supervision of war-related industries to make sure businesses were not profiteering</span>