1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alecsey [184]
2 years ago
13

Explain the case of McCulloch v Maryland and the decision of the Supreme Court.

History
1 answer:
drek231 [11]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

<em>McCulloch v. Maryland</em> (1819) was a landmark Supreme Court case that contributed to defining the political relationship between the central government and the states by establishing implied powers and federal supremacy over the states.


The case of <em>McCulloch v. Maryland</em> emerged as the United States Congress sought to reestablish a national bank in 1816; consequently, the Second Bank of the United States was chartered. In 1818, the State of Maryland’s legislature required taxes on all banks not chartered by the state, which included the Second Bank of the United States. James McCulloch, a cashier at the Baltimore branch of the bank in Maryland, would refuse to pay this tax, leading Maryland to file a lawsuit against McCulloch to collect the tax. The case would make its way to the Supreme Court of the United States, where the questions of a national bank’s constitutionality and whether the states had the power to tax a national bank (and thereby the central government) arose. In unanimity, Chief Justice John Marshall’s Supreme Court answered the aforementioned questions by ruling that under the United States Constitution’s Article I, Section 8, Necessary and Proper Clause, the federal government was vested with the implied powers to create a national bank, affirming both the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States and the idea that states did not have the power to tax a national bank because the central government reigns supreme over the states.


Chief Justice Marshall’s decision in this case effectively established the superiority of the central government to the states.

You might be interested in
What is the purpose of the Preamble to the Georgia Constitution?
Burka [1]

Answer:

D. to provide the government with the power necessary to control the

citizenship

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The English colonies of New York and New Jersey were originally _____.
sasho [114]
They were originally royal colonies. New York and New Jersey were under the direct control of the king. 

Hope this Helps! (:

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which minority group is made up with tribes who each have different cultures and history? a. African American c. Asian American
alexgriva [62]

Answer

Hi,

Answer

The minority group made up with tribes who each have different cultures and history is {A} African American

Explanation

African American are mainly compose individuals referred as descendants of slaves from Africa who were taken to the United States to work and wage wars. This minority group originated from a continent with unique 54 countries and over 3000 tribes that are diverse.Some common tribes with specific cultures include Zulu of South Africa , Himba of Namibia and Maasai of Kenya. Some inheritated cultures from  Africa that are visible in African Americans way of life are; the preservation of ethnic identity, powerful force in religion , mistrust  of Caucasians and an African family structure.

Best Wishes!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best explains the changes in higher education in Oklahoma in the 60s and 70s? A. Oklahomans ignored highe
raketka [301]

Answer:it’s C

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were the sophists different from the other philosophers of ancient greece? explain ur answer
lilavasa [31]

Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.

Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.

Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal,  regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.

Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract,  out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.

In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was British imperialism in India different from French imperialism in Asia? The British were the only ones to practice direc
    15·2 answers
  • The 1896 Supreme Court case of Plessy v. Ferguson affirmed the system of racial segregation if such separate facilities were whi
    9·1 answer
  • why is it important to consider the historical context surrounding an event when making a historical interpretation? apex A) eve
    9·2 answers
  • Socialism actually makes a Government better?​
    13·1 answer
  • Due today please help
    12·1 answer
  • Urgent!!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • What was the original intent of the Roman Republic? Why did the Romans decide to have that form of government?
    11·1 answer
  • HELP what the answer
    11·1 answer
  • Which actions accurately describe the role of the Central Intelligence Agency during the Cold War? Select three options.
    5·2 answers
  • Describe the impact of the Supreme Court on the shaping of federal public policy
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!