1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nina [5.8K]
2 years ago
11

Mr. X house burning down, inside there are two people his aged father who is in a wheelchair and a doctor who has discovered a c

ure for one of the world’s greatest diseases, and who still carries the formula in his head. There is only time to save one. Whom do you save? What leads you to make this decision? How would followers of ethical theorists have looked at responses to this case?​
Law
1 answer:
Salsk061 [2.6K]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

I would save my father.

Explanation:

Even if my father is in a wheelchair and <em>old</em>. He is still my father. Maybe in the future I can so find a doctor that has the cure for the world's greatest cure of that disease.

You might be interested in
Which of the roles in the court system that we discussed would you want as a career.
SpyIntel [72]

Answer: COURT REPOTER, Court reporters, also known as guardians of the record because of their impartiality and role within the judicial process, capture the words spoken by everyone during a court or deposition proceeding. Court reporters then prepare verbatim transcripts of proceedings.

Explanation: i am not sure what you and your teacher where talking about but here's a answer

8 0
3 years ago
which article of the U.S. Constitution deals with relations between states and the federal government
victus00 [196]

Answer:

article 4

Explanation:

AKA: article IV

7 0
3 years ago
Do you think the rights between federal and state are distributed equally?
Anarel [89]
Absolutely not!



you should look at a few articles, and see.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
26. Confidentiality may be waived if the information (1 point)
Elis [28]

Answer:

Could change the jurors' final verdict

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
What does “being a witness against themself” mean?
beks73 [17]

Answer:

When being a witness against themselves it means They don’t have to give any results regarding them I think that’s what it means I’m not sure look it up

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Most people ____ when someone changes their judgement.
    15·2 answers
  • Difference between first degree and second degree murder
    13·1 answer
  • What can the president be impeached for
    10·2 answers
  • Daniel objects to the work of a company that tests products on animals. He holds a meeting at his house to discuss a possible pr
    11·1 answer
  • An office block of 14,000m2 gross area with 80% lettable area in Muscat, let
    9·1 answer
  • A fellow employee, who is a disabled veteran, is complaining to you that she feels she was discriminated against in not getting
    10·1 answer
  • The constitution, as written in 1787, did not have a bill of rights and did not embrace the idea of democracy as being needed at
    13·1 answer
  • The shift in Canada WW1 and after that year, PLEASE HELP VERY EASY WRITE A PARAGRAPH
    7·2 answers
  • How are taking photographs and making casts similar? How are they different?
    10·1 answer
  • All of the Special Agent Entry Programs of the FBI require that an applicant have at least
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!