Intro:
The LGBTQ+ comunity is a large and powerfull comunity of people who just want to be themselves without judgement. Although, whith how our world is, and with so many groups wanting this same thing, the world is full of judgement, and hate.
paragraph 1:
the title LGBTQ+ is just an acronym(an abbreviation formed from the initial letters of other words)that stands for a basic showing of some sexualitys or ways people might identify themselves. The first letter of the acronym (L) stands for Lesbian, which means<em> </em><u>someone who identifies as a woman, likes only other women.</u> The G stands for Gay, which means<u> someone who identifys as a male, likes only other males.</u><em> </em>now is where it gets a little more "confusing". The B stands for bisexual (or bi), which means<em> </em><u>the person likes 2 genders.</u><em> </em>you would think boy and girl, but the person who identifies as bi could also like<em> boys</em> and non-binary people, or <em>girls</em> and non-binary people, ext. The T stands for trans which means <em>they feel like they are a other gender trapped inside a body that they were assigned at birth that is the opposite gender of who they believe they really are. </em>The last letter in the acronym is Q which stands for queer which is just an umbrella term for someone who feels like they are a part of the LGBTQ+ community who either doesn't know what label fits them, doesn't feel comfortable using any of the terms, or just likes the of just being "queer". last but not least, the + stands for all of the other parts of the community, like pansexual, omnisexual, asexual, Polyamory, non-binary, demi boy/girl, and MANY more.
you can go off of that if you'd like :)
Answer:
an context, Ignatius’ observations contrasting his own clothing with that of the people around him (paragraph 1) most clearly serve to emphasize…-In reading this question, I was confused on the thoughts of Ignatius and thought that overtime beliefs about clothing changed, when really his opinions never changed, and really his values were just unconventional. I have to know that in the first paragraph, the narrator is describing Ignatius’ clothing choices and what his beliefs are.
Explanation:
That depends on how you define what is right. If you define it based on society, then no, the rules wouldn’t change.
If you yourself define the rules, then what is stopping you from changing them?
