Answer: As powerful tool for learning but also a dangerous one
Explanation: I couldn't find the text that is missing in your question and what the author was introducing.
I would write something helpful about teaching televisions in the classroom and possible debates that can refer to it.
When we are talking about television, we are also considering influence of the media and the aspects on it. It can have many educational advantages but also it can have a lot of negative effects and that is where the debate starts. This problem is also explained in the article "The Good Things about Television"(maybe this is the article that is missing in your question). In this article it is described as a powerful tool in classroom but it must be used smart and wisely.
Television in classroom can help a lot but it is dangerous because many people are thinking that something bad can easily affect children.
Many debates are considering people that are thinking that television in classroom will stop children from reading books and being creative.
<span>D.He uses the words "pest" and "everything short of" to ridicule the introduction of the new species.
Weisman clearly shows in this passage that he does not believe these species and plants should have been introduced into Central Park. He shows that one of the types of birds has become a pest, and was only put there because "someone thought the city would be more cultured". His tone is condescending throughout.</span>
<span>True, after getting a marriage in a family which results expansion of the members. It is not by the way of adding two people but by other relatives belong to the couple also added as a family. Or also a family can include people by its own choice because a family can afford an orphan or like these people as a choice and it depends on the attitude of the particular family.</span>
B. false that is rude no matter what