<span>Captain Day’s men believed that the Massachusetts government had issued taxes and other measures that harmed the rights of citizens. While General Shepard’s government militia thought they were protecting their rights and protecting the new nation from anarchy and chaos. This is why they both used the declaration of independence for their basis.</span>
Answer:
I have to anwser my first Question
There are good arguments on both sides as to when and how fast to reopen the economy. In my view, the answer will vary state by state and industry by industry. There’s also an enormous amount of uncertainty as to exactly how to determine the optimal policy. In that environment, there’s a great advantage to having these decisions be made at as local a level as possible. Thus, while I suspect that Sweden’s current policy is not optimal, that Nordic country is doing a great service to Europe by providing evidence on the consequences of an alternative policy path.
Giving too much power to any one person is dangerous, especially when that person might be influenced by political considerations that go beyond the best interest of the country as a whole:
That’s not to say Trump’s views are necessary wrong; rather that the procedure he uses to reach decisions is not reliable. Thus I’d still favor local control even if in one particular case you could convince me that the views of the person who happened to be president at the time were superior to the views of the average mayor or governor. In the long run, competition between states will produce better governance than central planning.
The first white settlers to move to the area were traders and woodsmen, so they were viewed by the Lowcountry elite as “uncivilized.” The Lowcountry was the area that surrounded the city of Charleston along the Atlantic coast of the state.
Seditious speech targets the overthrow of the government of the day. This form of speech directly attacks government leaders and the institutions of government. It encourages the uprising or rebellion against the government. It is a criminal offense to practice seditious speech. Seditious speech can be both written and oral. The Sedition Act of 1798 was enacted to prevent the newspapers of the day from openly criticizing the government or its actions. It is interesting to note that the Sedition act is very similar to the act preventing espionage.