Considering how large of a GDP the US have, I would agree with such a move. There's several reasons why I would agree on such a move. One of them is of course the well being of the nature, as it is crucial for the survival of every living organism, including the humans. Reforestation will bring in lot of benefits that will gradually return the investment. For starters, the air quality will improve, and by doing so, the health problems among the people will reduce significantly, thus much less will be spent on healthcare. Part of the new forests can be fruit forests, which will be an enormous reserve of organic food without having to use any labor or effort in production. Also, by establishing forests, whole ecosystems will get back on the scene, so lot of useful plants can be harvested from the forests, such as herbs and mushrooms. If the US makes a deal so that it can use certain part of the benefits from the forests until it gets its enormous investment, it will be a win-win situation for everyone. In order to have the budget for the global reforestation, it would be the best to cut down on the budget for development of weapon of mass destruction and the budget for war.
A problem caused by the burning of fossil fuels is acid rain. Hope this helped :D
A catheters serves as a common source of nosocomial infection because they provide a direct route for pathogens to enter the human body.
<h3>What is a catheter?</h3>
In medical line, these are device that are used for patient for passing out of excretion while on sick bed.
Hence, through the catheters, the nosocomial infection that is a form of infectious diseases acquired in a health-care facility are easily transmitted,
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about catheter
<em>brainly.com/question/1507811</em>
Answer:
The use of the Pacific Ocean for trade and commerce is one big reason to consider Hong Kong and San Francisco as part of the same region. In addition, many current and former residents of Hong Kong feel a special kinship with San Francisco's Chinatown.
Answer:
Unlike previous mass extinctions, the sixth extinction is due to human actions. Some scientists consider the sixth extinction to have begun with early hominids during the Pleistocene.
