Answer:
ok
Explanation:
yh i did tell me what u need and i will hlp u
Answer: the genre is diffrent so is the plot
Explanation:
Answer:
The option which best explains how the historical passage might enhance a reader's understanding of the personal narrative is:
B. The historical passage connects the personal experience of planting and harvesting corn with technical information about farming.
Explanation:
We can easily eliminate option A because the passage does not show evidence of why the Wampanoag were once hunter-gatherers. Quite the opposite, instead of gathering they are farming in the passage.
Letter C claims that the story told by the grandfather is more factual. Looking this passage up online, I found the previous lines. The grandfather is actually telling a sort of fantastic story involving Mother Earth and the prairie rabbit. We can also eliminate this option.
Letter D claims that the passage is about modern technology and how it changed the Wampanoag's relationship with their harvest. However, the passage does not mention technology at all.
The best option then seems to be letter B. While the grandfather is talking about his experience with planting and farming, the narrator is describing it in more technical details: the types of crops that were sowed together and why.
The most common are 1st and 3rd person. 1st person is when you tell a story from your point of view, using the pronouns "I or we." And 3rd person is from an outside point of view, using the pronouns "he, she, and they." 2nd person isn't very common because it uses the pronoun "you," and makes the audience a character in the story. Hope this helps!
