Answer and Explanation:
Slavery in the United States was a paradox because it was stated in the constitution that all men are created equal, yet the same document contradicted it and there were laws such as the Virginia law passed in October 1705, stating that if a master was to kill a slave who was undergoing “correction,” it would not be considered a crime.
The Back-to-Africa Movement: also known as black Zionism or colonization movement was the the view that Americans of African ancestry should return to Africa. It failed woefully as most black Americans did not want to return to Africa. This is most likely because they didn't know the homelands of their ancestors and were not sure where to begin(afraid of starting afresh) or what the "strange land" of Africa held for them.
the Missouri compromise tried to achieve a balance of power between slave states and free states in Congress. It made Missouri a slave state and Maine a free state
The North was becoming more urban and industrial as there was the increase in population with new immigrants. The South started to lose its power in Congress.
John C. Calhoun was a South Carolina senator and was known to utilize the argument of states' rights to protect slavery in the Nullification Crisis of 1832-1833.
States' rights in American refers to the political powers that reserved only/exclusive to the U.S. state governments rather than the federal government as defined by the United States Constitution.
Secession: this is the act of withdrawing from a country or territory or state to form another government(country or territory). Advocates of secession are known as disunionists.
To avoid dissolution of the Union by appeasing both sides on the slavery issue. This is because the threat of dissolution was mainly founded on outstanding slavery issues and tension that would eventually bring about the civil war.
Please follow answers consecutively with questions above
It would be "to curb smuggling on key sea routes off the eastern coast" that was <span>not a professed aim of the Sugar Act of 1764, since its sole purpose was to raise revenue. </span>
1.) B. British victory in the French and Indian war.
From Greatest to Lowest:
Peninsulares
Creoles
Mestizos
Mulattoes
Africans
Native Americans
~ I hope this helps :)
When historians want to interpret historical facts, whether they are written traces, verbal records, artifacts, locations, certainly have a certain idea of the historical background. It's not a rare case that two or more historians have different ideas about the background that has caused a historical event. Also, theories that they want to prove can be different, and even the same theory viewed from multiple angles can have a completely different conclusion about an event. The narrative of the course of events is one of the usual procedures in the gradual presentation of all the circumstances and facts that have contributed to the event. What historians can not do, whether proving theory, the background, should not be biased, they must adhere to the fact, whether they contribute to or disprove their theory.
The answer is: b.
