This 'short essay' is basically asking you create a piece of writing, convincing your audience of your point. For example; I firmly believe that every single country should not have nuclear bombs. In general, I'd include:
*Nuclear Bomb Simulator to give an image I how much damage it does. What this does is, people tend to hate destructive behaviours. By showing them how much damage it does, you're appealing to their sense of emotion by conjuring a sense of panic.
*Death counts from previous wars to further reinforce the emotion of panic, sadness, and awareness. Death count for those individuals who demand solid scientific evidence.
In a nutshell, basically, include statistics (supports your argument with logical data that's already proven), history from past events if possible (to appeal to one's emotions), and if possible, choose evidence that's more modernized to further prove your point. Why so? Simply because it proves that the problem still persists, no matter how advanced in technology we are. in this case, nuclear bombs are going to be dangerous, regardless of how "modernized" we all are.
Hi <3
I would say either A or D, but I'm leaning towards A. It emphasizes an idea.
The sentence whose style is most appropriate with respect to clarity and simplicity of language is the first one - For centuries, art admirers have been digging through records of the painting to figure out its meaning.
The other sentences use language that is quite complicated.
Answer:
keep speaking it... keep teaching it make sure it flourishes!
Explanation:
