Answer:
It keeps one branch of government from becoming too powerful.
Explanation:
The citizens back then were from Britain and they hated how their king had ALL THE POWER. Therefore, they have made up checks and balances so that a branch doesn't seem tyrannic.
Answer:
The voyage of Columbus
inaugurated a network of global trade that connected both hemispheres. Silver from the New World was minted into the peso de ocho, a widely accepted currency that connected major trade systems. In the Pacific, the Spanish colony of Manila connected the New World with Asia markets; much of the New World's silver ended up in China. Despite this new level of global connectivity, this era saw major disruptions and changes in trade networks. Attempts by Portugal and Spain to monopolize trade in the Indian Ocean led to the down fall of the Swahili cities and the fall of Malacca. In Africa, the incorporation of West Africa into the Atlantic system drew the focus of trade from Trans-Saharan to the west. The fall of Constantinople to the Muslim Ottomans and Vasco DaGama’s maritime route to the Indian Ocean lessened Europe’s dependence upon Silk Road trade. The Atlantic System would emerge as the premier trade system in this era.
Explanation:
translate to spanish
Answer:
Narrative History
Explanation:
Narrative history is a method of writing history in a story-based format. This way of writing history makes past events more interesting as readers can interpret and analyze these pieces of information in a way that is relatable to modern understanding. It is divided into two forms namely; the traditional and modern narratives.
- The traditional narrative follows a chronological format.
- The modern narrative explains trends that influenced certain actions of people in the past and reasons why they did certain things.
I think it is d if I'm wrong I'm sorry
Credibility of the source is checking the degree of authenticity of a source
(You want to know how reliable is this information?)
There are multiple factors that can help to check its credibility:
Is the author of the source trusted?
Is the background of the source safe?
Is it a primary or secondary source?
Have the source become unaccurate or
obsolete due to time?
Is there any motive or signs that the source is biased?