=The Stanford prison experiment (SPE) was a social psychology experiment that attempted to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power, focusing on the struggle between prisoners and prison officers. It was conducted at Stanford University on the days of August 14–20, 1971, by a research group led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo using college students.[1] In the study, volunteers were randomly assigned to be either "guards" or "prisoners" in a mock prison, with Zimbardo himself serving as the superintendent. Several "prisoners" left mid-experiment, and the whole experiment was abandoned after six days. Early reports on experimental results claimed that students quickly embraced their assigned roles, with some guards enforcing authoritarian measures and ultimately subjecting some prisoners to psychological torture, while many prisoners passively accepted psychological abuse and, by the officers' request, actively harassed other prisoners who tried to stop it. The experiment has been described in many introductory social psychology textbooks,[2] although some have chosen to exclude it because its methodology is sometimes questioned.[3]
The U.S. Office of Naval Research[4] funded the experiment as an investigation into the causes of difficulties between guards and prisoners in the United States Navy and United States Marine Corps. Certain portions of it were filmed, and excerpts of footage are publicly available.
Some of the experiment's findings have been called into question, and the experiment has been criticized for unscientific methodology and possible fraud.[5][6] Whereas the experiment purported to show that prison guards instinctively embraced sadistic and authoritarian personalities, Zimbardo actually instructed the "guards" to exert psychological control over the "prisoners". Critics also noted that some of the participants behaved in a way that would help the study, so that, as one "guard" later put it, "the researchers would have something to work with," which is known as demand characteristics. Variants of the experiment have been performed by other researchers, but none of these attempts have replicated the results of the SPE.
Hope this helps and hope this is whst you are looking for!
The verb form of different is differ
Answer:
1). A painting <u>belonging</u> to the Queen has been stolen.
2). These beautiful costumes, <u>worn</u> by famous opera singers are for sale.
3). The star of the show is an actor <u>known</u> by most people as a TV presenter.
4). It was difficult for people <u>sitting</u> at the back of the theatre to hear all the words.
5). I bought a copy of the novel <u>signed</u> by the author.
6). This piece, <u>written</u> by my piano teacher, is one of my favorites.
7). The fast train,<u> leaving</u> in five minutes, will get you to London in less than an hour.
Explanation:
Participle clauses are defined as the clauses beginning with either present(walking, going, etc.), past(read, reached, etc.), or perfect participle(having gone, having done, etc.). It primarily functions to help convey the information in a more brief and precise manner. It functions to provide detail to the sentence either by modifying the verb or a noun/pronoun.
I'm pretty sure the answer is
A) flat character
<u><em>his or her</em></u>
his or her will refer to anyone in the neighborhood
