Any choices???......................
On this day in 1830, the Mexican government passed a law that helped
foment the Texas Revolution. The law is said to be analogous to the
Stamp Act, which encouraged the American Revolution. Among its
provisions, it forbade the further introduction of slaves into Mexico,
and apparently was intended to suspend existing empresario contracts.
Article 11, the most inflammatory part, was intended to prohibit or
limit immigration from the United States. Texas colonists were greatly
disturbed by news of the law. Although Stephen F. Austin secured
exemption from the operation of the law for his contract and for that of
Green DeWitt, the measure shook his belief in the good will of the
Mexican government. Enforcement of the law resulted directly in the
Anahuac Disturbances of 1832 and indirectly in the battle of Velasco,
the conventions of 1832 and 1833, and the accumulation of grievances
that helped lead to the revolution.
The nile river and southern tip
Answer:
The spread of "Communism"
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the text. Without the text, we do not know what it says and we cannot give any point of view about the text.
You also forgot to include the cartoon.
However, trying to help you with something useful, we can comment on the following, taking into consideration the period of 1890-1910.
Imperialistic views were growing in the United States after the Spanish-American War in which the United States defeated Spain. The result of that victory was that the Island of Cuba got rid of the Spanish presence and the United States gained control of the Philippines, Guam, and Puerto Rico.
It was also a time in which US President Theodore Roosevelt created the "Roosevelt Corollary," in support of the ideas of the Monroe Doctrine, in which the United States made the clear statement that European nations were not welcomed to maintain interventionist actions in Latin America. Another European intervention in the region was going to be interpreted as direct aggression to the United States.
