Answer:
Explanation:
A note on classification: By any system of measurement, Paris is the biggest city in France. That much is clear; but after that, classifying French towns and cities in order of size is an art, rather than a science, since the results depend very much on the criteria used. Different French statistical data use different yardsticks, and "cities" can be classed in several different ways, notably by "urban area" (aire urbaine) , by "urban unit" (unité urbaine), or by borough (commune).
These terms are defined as follows:
"Urban area" - A metropolitan area, i.e. the whole area which can be viewed as a coherent economic/employment unit.
"Urban unit" - The "conurbation", the densely populated heart of that area, or "agglomération".
"Commune" - A borough, the basic unit of local administration in France, with its municipal council.
To make a comparison with London, "Greater London" would be an urban area, the "London postal area" would be an urban unit, and the "City of London" would be a commune.
Answer:
A! it is a unique object with significance to rider
Explanation:
i took the test
<u>Car rally:</u>
In a street rally, contenders contend over a foreordained course with time as the opponent. Vehicles start at (normally) one-minute interims. There is no immediate no holds barred dashing, and nowadays the accentuation is particularly on route and cooperation instead of absolute speed.
They run with time as the opponent, each vehicle in turn, on earth, asphalt, and anything in the middle. They run in all climate, in for all intents and purposes each nation on the planet. The game is a brilliant, beautiful thing, all commotion, and brutality and sliding sideways between trees at 100 mph.
The easiest answer is that Rally is each vehicle in turn on an open street shut down for hustling, and Rallycross is numerous autos running together on a shut course explicitly intended for dashing.
Answer:
I think its B
Explanation:
since a professor has already written books on the production of food he should be well prepared for writing an article. People who already write have a better ability to grab a reader's attention.
the tv reporter has only visited a single fast food museum, so he wouldn't have much to write on.
the former worker is already mad at being fired (he would write negatively about the place) and only has knowledge about meat. (in my opinion)
the senator could be a good option but his field is law not writing.
hope this helps :-)
