1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katen-ka-za [31]
2 years ago
9

Was the united state correct 1945 when it became the first nation to use atomic weapons against japan to end world war 2 or was

it morally and ethically a wrong decision?????????
History
2 answers:
Dominik [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

It was a morally wrong decision to drop the atomic bombs.

Explanation:

This is a heavily debated opinion-based question where you can go both ways. In my personal opinion, I personally argue that it was morally wrong for the US to use atomic weapons on Japan. Below is my reasoning.

1. Japan had already expressed the desire to surrender previous to the dropping of the atomic bombs, meaning that they were not a military necessity.

Prior to the dropping of the atomic bombs, Japan had already expressed the desire to surrender under the single condition that their emperor would not be harmed. (This was mainly due to cultural reasons that made the emperor a particularly important figure) Instead of accepting, the United States instead decided to fight for unconditional surrender. While they did achieve that in the end, they ended up not harming the emperor anyway, meaning that they could have just accepted Japan's surrender in my personal opinion. Moreover, this desire disproves the argument that the decision to drop the bomb was a military necessity and many contribute Japan's surrender more so to the Soviet invasion of Manchuria which meant Japan now had to fight a two-front war.

2. Atomic weapons are a form of indiscriminite killing.

Atomic weapons don't have eyes. They can't tell the difference between the military and civilians. Thousands of women and children were killed that had no involvement in the war. It is a war crime to intentionally target civilians, so why would atomic weapons be ethically acceptable? While the US did drop leaflets to warn civilians prior to the attacks, this act is not enough, and it cannot be expected for millions to flee thier homes.

3. The government may have been considering diplomatic reasons rather than solely ending the war.

If the US was really after a speedy end to the end of the war, there could have been many other ways to go about it. They could have continued to firebomb cities or accept conditional surrender. Some have argued that the diplomatic effects that came with it such as scaring the Soviets and proving US dominance were also in policymakers' minds. If the US had not been victorious in World War II, several important members of the government would have likely been tried as war criminals.

The Counter Argument:

Of course, there is also a qualified opposing view when it comes to this. It is perfectly valid to argue that the bomb was necessary for ending the war: as it is impossible to know the "what ifs" had history not happened the way it did. It is undeniable that the atomic bomb likely saved thousands of American lives if the war would have continued, and the war did ultimately come to an end a couple of days after the atomic bombs. There also is not enough evidence as to what exactly was the reason the Japanese unconditionally surrendered: it could have been Manchuria or the atomic bomb, both, or even other reasons entirely. Lastly, the general public did approve of the bombings at the time.

In recent years, the public have slowly become more critical of the bombings, although it remains a weighted moral debate.

Note: These are my personal views and this does explicitly represent the views of anyone else. Please let me know if you have any questions :)

Ksenya-84 [330]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

i was morally and ethically a wrong decision

Explanation:

You might be interested in
james wants to estimate the absolute age of an animal fossil, however the test results show that that fossil doesnt contain any
____ [38]

From the provided options, the conclusion made by James regarding the lack of carbon 14 could be the use of relative dating in estimating the age of fossils.

The third option is the correct answer.

<h3>What are fossils?</h3>

Fossils are the remains of the dead organisms that are preserved for so many years in a museum.

According to the situation, James analyses that the fossils don't have any content of carbon 14 at the time of estimating the absolute age of that fossil of an animal. This happens may be due to the decay of that fossil over the years.

<u>Question's missing part:</u>

Following are the options in relation to the question:

1) Without carbon-14, it will be an impossible task to estimate the age of the fossil.

2) Finding another fossil nearby without carbon-14 will guarantee that he has matching fossils.

3) Without carbon-14, James can use relative dating to estimate the age of the fossil.

4) The animal's carbon-14 decayed long before the animal died.

5) The animal, whether living or dead, never had carbon-14 in its system.

Therefore, James can use the relative dating process in order to identify the age of an animal fossil.

Learn more about the fossils in the related link:

brainly.com/question/6867325

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
Which of the following statements is not true regarding the intention of this piece of art known as the Perumal Temple Statue? a
Bogdan [553]

Answer:D

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plss help Use the excerpt to answer the question.
steposvetlana [31]

The primary source document supports the historical narrative that the Mongols gave preferential treatment to certain religions are of the following historical arguments is best supported by this excerpt. Thus, option (b) is correct.

What is document?

The term “document” refers to the details and information that are in written and electronic form. The documents are sometimes confidential and contain personal information.

According to the document was the primary source was the first source in the evidence. The historical arguments are the historical narrative of the Mongols are the preferential treatment of the certain common religions.

Therefore, option (b) is correct.

Learn more about on document, here:

brainly.com/question/27396650

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
What were some benefits Aericans discovered out west?<br><br> (Written Short answer)
kykrilka [37]

Answer: In the West, Americans found a lot of land to expand, new species of plants and animals, and access to the Pacific Ocean. Because of their access to the largest body of water on the planet, international trade was possible (but wouldn't begin for another 75 or so years, assuming that this is in the mid-1800s).

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did w.e.b. dubois have in common with harriet martineau?
VashaNatasha [74]
<span>Both Harriet Martineau and W. E. B. Du Bois are both socialists but the former is British and the later is an American. They both were interested by the promise made by the American constitution in the grounds of democracy but were later appalled as the promise was not exactly fulfilled..</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the four types of trenches used by the allies
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Allies respond to the Berlin blockade?
    7·2 answers
  • What the us census is completed each state is notified how its population affects its number of congressional district.this proc
    7·1 answer
  • What was the legacy of the Cold War in Guatemala, Cuba, and Chile over the long term?
    7·1 answer
  • Which is one type of play that Shakespeare wrote?
    5·1 answer
  • As a result of the French Revolution of 1791 and the Napoleonic Wars, people most wanted
    10·2 answers
  • 18. What's the primary cause for how Russia industrialized at the most rapid rate of all European power?
    9·2 answers
  • Why was Cyrus the great famous for an advanced civilization? ​
    14·1 answer
  • 11. The war gave rise to a new identity for African Americans, known as the “New
    14·1 answer
  • Who took the page from Chaitanya Bhagabat ?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!