They are fearful about "runaway" conventions making unwanted changes.
The process of constitution change is a political process and therefore there is always a risk of run away conventions coming up with unwanted and sometimes undesirable changes.
Hello Martincoretox9aum, an earl is a member of the nobility. The title is Anglo-Saxon in origin, akin to the Scandinavian form jarl, and meant "chieftain", particularly a chieftain set to rule a territory in a king's stead. In Scandinavia, it became obsolete in the Middle Ages and was replaced by duke (hertig/hertug/hertog). In later medieval Britain, it became the equivalent of the continental count (in England in the earlier period, it was more akin to a duke; in Scotland it assimilated the concept of mormaer). However, earlier in Scandinavia, jarl could also mean a sovereign prince.<span>[citation needed]</span> For example, the rulers of several of the petty kingdoms of Norway had the title of jarl
and in many cases they had no less power than their neighbours who had
the title of king. Alternative names for the rank equivalent to
"Earl/Count" in the nobility structure are used in other countries, such
as the hakushaku of the post-restoration Japanese Imperial era.In modern Britain, an earl is a member of the peerage, ranking below a marquess and above a viscount. A feminine form of earl never developed; instead, countess is used.
The contract Chain was a series of a league, federation, and treaties formed and specified during the 17th century, mainly between the Haudenosaunee or Iroquois Confederacy and the British colonies of North America, joined with Indian tribes. First elaborated in specified degree area of New York at a time of cruelty and social uncertainty for the community and Native Americans, the Iroquois, and English committee, and future treaties were based on supporting peace and solidity to conserve and sustain trade. They inscribe issues of inhabitant settlement and tried to subdue cruelty between colonists and the tribes of Indian.They even declared its neutrality.
Martin Lurther King Jr is by far one of my favourite historical figures. What he did is very inspirational, and teaches many of us (not only the minority) that we can still make a difference, even in times of difficulty.
At rechieving his Nobel Peace Prize, Martin Lurther King Jr, delivered a speech that touched many hearts. It was about the fight to freedom.
"...win the racial injustice...I accept...we move with determination...establish a rain of freedom...our children crying out of brotherhood...trying to secure the right to vote...who were brutalized...unrelenting struggle...this movement is [to achieve]...that non-violence is the answer to the political and moral questions on our time...without resorting to violence and oppression...have demonstrated that non-violence...is a POWERFUL moral force..."\
Answer: D
I hope this helps :)
