Answer:
The major change in the U.S immigration policy that was reflected in the United States Immigration Act of 1965 was the abolition of the quota system of immigration based on national origin which was what was invoke prior to the enactment of the 1965 Immigration Act.
Explanation:
The United States Immigration Act of 1965 brought with it innovation in the U.S immigration policy. Prior to the enactment of the Act, immigration into the U.S was based on a quota system which was bench-marked on national origin. The quota system was viewed as discriminatory, thus some civil rights movements clamored against it and called for a reform of the United States Immigration policy. This led to a heated debate in the United States congress, and consequently, the enactment of the 1965 Immigration Act which abolished the quota system and enthroned a more liberal immigration policy which was more accommodating of immigrants. The 1965 Immigration Act focused more on absorbing immigrants with skilled labor and refugees from war torn countries into the United States as well as reuniting immigrant families.
Answer:
look below since I think the answer gives limited amounts of characters
Explanation:
If I was in Truman's shoes and I lost the ships from Pearl Harbor I would definately fight back, there is no way I'm going to stay quiet from someone hurting my country and costs lives and lots of money. The options were Raid Japan, Invade Japan, bomb in an inhabitant area or a populated area.
<em>Pros and cons of</em><em> raiding Japan</em><em> </em>
<em>pros- Japan will see us as a threat and no longer want to mess with the US </em>
<em>CONS-More lives will be lost and will lose a future ally. </em>
<em />
<em>Pros and cons of </em><em>invading Japan</em>
<em>pros- Japan will be ours and they will have to surrender </em>
<em>CONS- could cost more lives lost than needed. </em>
<em />
<em>Pros and cons of </em><em>Bombing inhabited area</em>
<em>pros- </em><em>No one gets hurt and less lives will be lost </em>
<em>cons- Japan might cause another bombing </em>
<em>Pros and cons of </em><em>Bombing populated area</em>
<em>pros- Japan will fear us and must surrender </em>
<em>cons- many lives will be lost .</em>
<em />
I believe Truman was better off dropping the bomb to prove to other countries to never mess with the USA again and if he didn't Japan might cause another bombing.
B) the world sought payment from Germany for all the damage.
At the conclusion of World War I, the Allied and Associate Powers included in the Treaty of Versailles a plan for reparations to be paid by Germany. Germany was required to pay 20 billion gold marks, as an interim measure, while a final amount was decided upon. In 1921, the London Schedule of Payments established the German reparation figure at 132 billion gold marks (separated into various classes, of which only 50 billion gold marks was required to be paid). Meanwhile, the industrialists of Germany's Ruhr Valley, who had lost their factories in Lorraine (Germany had seized Lorraine in 1870 and it went back to France after WW1), demanded hundreds of millions of marks as compensation from the German government. Despite having large obligations under the Versailles Treaty, the German government paid the Ruhr Valley industrialists for their losses. This contributed significantly to the hyperinflation that followed.
Answer:
Taxes
Explanation:
People pay taxes, so it is B
Hope this helps plz hit the crown :D
