Throughout most of its 19 centuries of dominance in the ancient Near East from 2500 BC to 605 BC, the method of governance in the Assyrian Empire was a strong monarchy. The king's authority was bolstered by a powerful army and, at the height of the Assyrian Empire, by a well-organized central bureaucracy whose leadership collected tribute and military draftees.
The historical extent of the Assyrian Empire is broken into three periods designated as Old Assyrian, Middle Assyrian and Neo-Assyrian. The Neo-Assyrian Empire became the most powerful empire in the world up to that time. The king often controlled entire populations of conquered peoples by exiling them far from their original homelands. Of others, he exacted tribute through the administrators set up in each province. His main strength, however, was his standing army, a disciplined and well-equipped fighting force continually strengthened by conscription.
Another factor that strengthened the king's control over his empire was religion. He was not only head of the secular political administration, but also the high priest of Ashur, the official god. As such, he provided the temples and priests with financial support and sustenance, and the priests emerged as powerful figures in society. The king's position as all-powerful monarch did not prevent internal discord. The history of the Assyrian Empire is fraught with assassinations of the rulers, often by close relatives. However, the ubiquitous strong army and harsh laws with severe punishments for infractions kept the empire in order.
Answer: The name for that type of government is a monarchy if that is what you are asking. The word does come from Ancient Greek roots.
"The word monarchy comes from the Greek root words monos (which means “one”) and arkhein (which means “rule”). From about 2000 B.C.E. to 800 B.C.E., most Greek city-states were ruled by monarchs—usually kings (the Greeks did not allow women to have power)"
Republicans captured all of the seats held by incumbents, as well as eight additional Senate seats and 53 additional House seats. Gingrich was elected as the House Speaker.
<h3>Which best describes the result of the midterm election in 1994? </h3>
Democrats had a slim majority in both houses of Congress. Senate and House majorities were won by Republicans. Republicans continued to hold power in Congress when President Clinton was re-elected in 1996.
The 1994 midterm election results were referred to as the "Republican revolution" or the "Gingrich revolution" in the media. It refers to the success of the Republican Party in the House of Representatives and Senate. The American populace was said to be in a change-ready mood.
With a conservative "Contract with America," Newt Gingrich led Republicans in a broad frontal assault on Clinton's liberal missteps in 1994. As a result, Republicans captured all of the seats held by incumbents, as well as eight additional Senate seats and 53 additional House seats. Gingrich was elected as the House Speaker.
To learn more about the midterm election in 1994 refer to:
brainly.com/question/20355072
#SPJ4
<span>The answer is A. In a
monopoly is only one provider of a certain resource or service that the public
needs. In this kind of situation that
provider gains access to majority of the profits generated. Competition is eliminated since he controls that
particular good or service that consumers demand so much of. The stronger the demand for that good, the
more profits that provider makes. These
days there are laws against monopoly. In
fair market economy, there should be competitors in providing goods and
services. This way, consumers can choose
from whom they purchase these goods from.</span>
