The way you could explain the meaning of the sentence to someone who doesn’t understand is to state that the sentence actually means that the food there is very good.
This is because the diction used, "The food at the restaurant was fire." can be easily misunderstood as a person could think that the food WAS ON FIRE.
<h3>What is Diction?</h3>
This refers to the word selection or choice that is used to narrate an event.
Hence, we can see that The way you could explain the meaning of the sentence to someone who doesn’t understand is to state that the sentence actually means that the food there is very good.
This is because the diction used, "The food at the restaurant was fire." can be easily misunderstood as a person could think that the food WAS ON FIRE.
Read more about diction here:
brainly.com/question/1503891
#SPJ1
They have to fit in where you put them
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
The main conflict in this sentence is: "she picked up a leatherette case with lipstick in it"
The conflict in a literary work is the struggle between two forces. It is the problem that must be overcome before a resolution is reached.
In this sentence, picking up a case with lipstick in it is portrayed as abnormal. It represents a problem that must be sorted in the story.
Learn more about conflicts here:
brainly.com/question/24769299
"small boat"
how boat? => small boat.
the answer is "small".
"turbulend river"
how river? => turbulent river
the answer is "turbulent".
Good luck with :))
