Answer:
because northern political interests were against the addition of a new slave state
Explanation:
the United States declined to integrate it into the union, primarily because the northern political forces were resistant to the creation of a modern slave state. The Mexican Government even supported border attacks and threatened that any effort at invasion would lead to war.Initially, the United States declined to integrate it into the union, primarily because the northern political forces were resistant to the creation of a modern slave state. The Mexican Government even supported border attacks and threatened that any effort at invasion would lead to war.
hope this helped!
Answer: depending on whom one reads, Polk comes across as either a nearly great President or as a man who missed great opportunities. Clearly, his impact was significant. Polk accomplished nearly everything that he said he wanted to accomplish as President and everything he had promised in his party's platform: acquisition of the Oregon Territory, California, and the Territory of New Mexico; the positive settlement of the Texas border dispute; lower tariff rates; the establishment of a new federal depository system; and the strengthening of the executive office. He masterfully kept open lines of communication with Congress, established the Department of the Interior, built up an administrative press, and conducted himself as a representative of the whole people. Polk came into the presidency with a focused political agenda and a clear set of convictions. He left office the most successful President since George Washington in the accomplishment of his goals.
Answer:
B) they shared religious beliefs
Explanation:
The Separatists were a group of people that formed in Britain that wanted to form a new church separate from the English church. Hence the name...
Answer:
Yes there would be a gain to the United States from importing any of those products from Britain because it only has absolute advantage not comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage in international trade is the ability of a nation to produce more goods with its resources without considering that there might a better alternative to which resources can be deployed that would yield more output compared to its trading partners.
While on the other hand ,comparative advantage is when a country has a lower opportunity costs in producing an item compared to its rival nations.
Which means the country that has comparative advantage is given up less opportunities when producing its desired goods viz-a-viz its competing nations.
In other words,absolute advantage does not guarantee efficiency,only comparative advantage does.
