All categories

3 years ago

The created a multimember executive, whereas the created a one-person executive

1 answer:

5 0

The looser interpretation of the law created a multimember executive whereas the strict interpretation created a one-person executive. This filling in of the blanks creates an appropriate and meaningful sentence. Laws may be open to various interpretations. If "person" was thought to be a singular physical person, that would give rise to a strict interpretation for the purposes of the law and a "one-person executive". Operational definitions are important, and "person" could be interpreted as an "entity" or a "collective" in which case the looser interpretation of a law would be at play to create the "multi-member executive".

You might be interested in

In two to three paragraphs, summarize below what you learned about shopping for tires.

Stels [109]

I learned that when shopping for tires, it's good to keep an open mind and go with what you can afford, and get the best quality your dollar amount can purchase. It's best to go to several places that sell tires and get quotes on the tires, and if you can get the same tires for less, go with those. Hope this helped :)

3 0

3 years ago

Benefits of a better education include all of the following

levacccp [35]

The answer should be letter C.

7 0

4 years ago

After a report that saving in the united states is at an all time low, jeopardizing many family's retirement plans, americans be

Ivanshal [37]

Savings usually have positive impacts on economic growth of a nation. Firstly, increase in the amount of money saved increase the amount of money that are available in the banks which can be used for investment purposes that will benefit the economy. Secondly, high saving rate in an economy increases the ability of that economy to recover from inflation and recession. Personally and nationally, saving helps to cope better with economic and financial down turns.

5 0

4 years ago

A large law firm uses an average of 40 boxes of copier paper a day. The firm operates 260 days a year. Storage and handling cost

Drupady [299]

1. Ordering 204 boxes will minimize the sum of annual ordering and carrying costs

2. Total cost will be $6118.82

3. Yes,annual ordering and carrying costs always equal at the EOQ.

Explanation:

D = 40 boxes per for 260 days

= $40 \times 260 = 10400$ boxes

S = $60

H = $30

1. $Q = \sqrt{\frac{2DS}{H} }$

$= \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 10400 \times 60}{30} }$

= 203.96

Q = 204 boxes

2. $TC = \frac{Q \times H}{2} + \frac{D \times S}{Q}$

$= \frac{204 \times 30}{2} + \frac{10400 \times 60}{204}$

$= 3060 + 3058.82$

TC= $6118.82

7 0

3 years ago

The problem now is to decide which contractor to choose.B has indicated that for another $20 million he could do the job in 18 m

Ede4ka [16]

Question: The question is incomplete. See the full question below and the answer.

You are an up-and-coming developer in downtown Seattle and are interested in constructing a building on a site you own. You have collected four bids from prospective contractors. The bids include both a cost ($millions) and time to completion (months):

Contractor Cost Time

A 100 20

B 80 25

C 79 28

D 82 26

The problem now is to decide which contractor to choose. B has indicated that for another $20 million, he could do the job in 18 months, and you have said that you would be indifferent between that bid and the original proposal. In talking with C, you have indicated that you would just as soon pay her an extra $million if she could get the job done in 26 months. Who gets the job? Explain your reasoning. (It may be convenient to plot the four alternatives on a graph.)

Answer:

See the explanation for the answer and find attached of the graph.

Explanation:

So we draw a regression line of Time vs Cost and best fit a curve based on the data given, given in the above figure. The four alternatives are marked in the figure as well. Our main objective is to reduce both time and cost, but that might not be possible So the best thing would be to look for alternatives which lie below the line. If C gets an extra million, then that point would come below the regression line, and it would be a better alternative than D, because for the same time we are getting the job done at a cheaper cost.

Also if B is paid extra 20 million, that point also comes below the regression line, and hence will be a better alternative than A because for the same cost again we are getting the job done earlier. We need to choose between B and C. Now in order to optimise both cost and time, we need to choose a point close to the middle point of the regression line segment in 1st quadrant. We see that C is much more closer to the middle point and hence seems like a better option.

So we choose C as our contractor if we consider B's alternative bid, but if we do not consider B's alternative bid and stick to the original one, we choose B as our contractor.

8 0

3 years ago

The ________ created a multimember executive, whereas the ________ created a one-person executive

The created a multimember executive, whereas the created a one-person executive