1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leokris [45]
2 years ago
15

What information might the geographer be able to convey more clearly than

History
1 answer:
scZoUnD [109]2 years ago
8 0

The geographer would be able to convey more clearly the relative sizes of an area affected by each level of unemployment.

<h3>Geographer </h3>

A geographer is expert in gathering geographical data through field observations, maps and conduct surveys or interviews over geographical area for the concerning matter.

Therefore option (c) is the correct answer.

To learn more about geographer, refer here:

brainly.com/question/17569836

#SPJ2

You might be interested in
How did the Enlightenment and American Revolution change the way people viewed their relationship to their rulers
romanna [79]
The Enlightenment and the American Revolution changed the way people viewed their relationship to their rulers, because it provided the individual to see that their ruler may not have their best interest at heart. It also helped people see that rationalism is more important than tradition and religion, which the monarchies around Europe often used in a way where it seemed acceptable that they were absolute monarchies, because of tradition.
4 0
3 years ago
1, who wants to be friends???
olasank [31]
<span>In the late 1800s, people in many parts of the world decided to leave their homes and immigrate to the United States. Fleeing crop failure, land and job shortages, rising taxes, and famine, many came to the U. S. because it was perceived as the land of economic opportunity. 
Hope This Helps Brainlest Please</span>
8 0
4 years ago
999 forever!!!!!!!!!
Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

yes JUICE RIP REST IN PIECE ONE OF GREATEST RAPPERS OAT OF ALL TIME

Explanation:

U DONT DESERVE SUFFER IN THIS WORLD JUICE, GOD WANTS YOU TO BE THERE WITH HIM, WITH THE OTHER AMAZING PEOPLE

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which amendment protects the rights of these people to take action?
Vsevolod [243]
I'd assume this is the first amendment since it protects the right to press and assembly which is what people need in order to take action.
5 0
3 years ago
Read this excerpt from the Supreme Court ruling in Miranda v. Arizona, issued by Justice Earl
lutik1710 [3]

1- The correct answer is C. In Miranda v. Arizona, the main discussion refers to the guarantee against selfincrimination.

Miranda v. Arizona was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court ruled that both incriminating and exculpatory statements made in response to an interrogation by a defendant in police custody are admissible in a trial only if the prosecution can show that the defendant was informed before being questioned of what is now it is known as Miranda warning: the right to consult a defense lawyer before and during interrogation, and the right not to self-incriminate. And besides, the defendant should not only understand these rights, but should also give them up voluntarily.

2- The requirements for libel detailed in New York Times v Sullivan protect the principle of judicial review.

The judges must check whether or not there is a actual malice in the statements made by the press before an aggrieved individual. If there were no actual malice, press freedom predominates before the right of individuals.

3- After the Westboro Baptist Church protested the funeral of Matthew Snyder, the Supreme  Court ruling in Phelps v. Snyder upheld that the government cannot regulate the content of a protest.

Albert Snyder, the father of a dead Marine, filed a lawsuit against Fred Phelps, his two daughters and the Westboro Baptist Church, who protested at the funeral of his son.

The Court ruled in favor of Fred Phelps, stating that those who speak publicly about a public issue can not be sued for the deliberate infliction of emotional distress, even if the speech in question is insidious or insulting. The verdict was supported by eight judges, while Samuel Alito was opposed.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The California Master Plan was created to
    14·1 answer
  • What is the definition of a conquistador?
    12·2 answers
  • The United States Senator who led the noninterventionists in Congress and called for neutrality legislation in the 1930s was .
    9·1 answer
  • How did Japan plan to solve its economic problems?
    8·1 answer
  • 80 POINTS! write two or three sentences explaining what Lincoln believed the Civil War was being fought to accomplish. Think abo
    7·1 answer
  • Which were not produced by Nubian artisans? A. Pottery B. Jewelry C. Pyramids D. Ziggurats
    12·1 answer
  • The Supreme Court case brown v board of education of Topeka answered which legal questions
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPP!
    15·1 answer
  • What are some fun facts about King Wu? (Zhou Dynasty 1045 BC)
    6·2 answers
  • What information does the Preamble provide?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!