Choose the best answer:
Review the argument.
Claim #1: David likes peanut butter.
Claim #2: Some people who like peanut butter are jk word.
Conclusion: David is a jk word.
Which best identifies an error in the relevance of this argument?
A preference for or against peanut butter is not a valid way to evaluate an individual's personality.
Hope this helps!
A I DID THE TEST it was easy
Answer:
What are the "Following"??? Is it a multiple choice??
Explanation:
When you post the multiple choice questions Ill come back and edit my answer and help you XD!!!
Answer:
manufactured
Explanation:
common:scarce::human-made:manufactured
The first two words of the analogy are antonyms, so we have to think of an antonym for <em>human-made</em> to complete the analogy.
Hope I helped!
Answer:
Analogy
Explanation:
Uses Like or as
ROV is compared to diving duck