You can express the edge lengths in terms of "cubes" or you divide the total volume by the volume of a cube. It works either way.
Edge lengths are
.. 80 cubes by 8 cutes by 13 cubes
so total volume is
.. (80 * 8 * 13) = 8320 cubes
In cubic inches, the volume is
.. (20 in)*(2 in)*(3 1/4 in) = 130 in^3.
The volume of a 1/4-in cube is (1/4 in)^3 = 1/64 in^3.
Then the number of cubes that will fit in the prism is
.. (130 in^3)/(1/64 in^3) = 8320 . . . . cubes
8320 cubes are needed to fill the rectangular prism.
Answer:
The area of the entire rectangle is given by: x^3 + 11x^2 + 18x
Step-by-step explanation:
The calculation of its area is straightforward, we only need to multiply its height times its width:
A = (x + 9)(x^2 + 2x)= x^3 + 2x^2 + 9x^2 +18x = x^3 + 11x^2 + 18x
Therefore the are are of the entire rectangle is given by: x^3 + 11x^2 + 18x
Answer:
the outside fence has a 64 feet perimeter
1. Exponential would be the best option to model the data because of the large increase. It would be more difficult to model it linear because the linear values would jump from 10 to 34 to 91 etc. there is a no correlation between them.
2. We can tell which function is the best based on the y values and x values. Especially with key words like double or triple we know that’s it going to be exponential. Linear would be like if we were presenting a graph for tickets and prices which is a straight line with increasing x and y values and the rate of change is constant.
Exponential usually have a consistent multiplier so it won’t be the same but there will be a pattern.
3. 4 data points would be 1,2,3,4 for x values and for y (2,4,6,8). I set up the data to be constant the x values are adding by 1 and the y values are added by 2. If we were graphing this it would obviously be a straight line.
Answer:
41 years old
Step-by-step explanation:
comment if you want work