Answer:
5.925%
Explanation:
For computing the cost of debt, first we have to determine the YTM by using the Rate formula that is shown in the attachment
Given that,
Present value = $1,050
Assuming figure - Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 8% = $80
NPER = 20 year - 1 year = 19 year
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this,
1. The pretax cost of debt is 7.50%
2. And, the after tax cost of debt would be
= Pretax cost of debt × ( 1 - tax rate)
= 7.50% × ( 1 - 0.21)
= 5.925%
Answer:
A: $127.2
B: $123.384, $3.816 per share and $3,816 per contract
C: 9.43%
Explanation:
A: Futures price
F° = S° (1 + rₙ) = $120 x 1.06
= $127.20
B: Change in Future Price and Investor Margin account:
New Spot = $120 (1 – 0.03)
= $120 x 0.97
= $116.40
New Futures = $116.40 (1.06)
= $123.384
The long investor loses = $127.20 - $123.384
= $3.816 per share
or $3.816 (1,000) = $3,816 per contract
C: Percentage return on the investor’s position:
Percentage return = $12,000 / $127,200
= 9.43%
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
Answer: C. AA-rated short-term bonds
Explanation:
It was stated that the client has a low risk tolerance. Therefore, to reduce the credit risk, investment grade bonds are appropriate (BBB or higher). To reduce the interest rate risk, short-term maturities will be preferable to long-term maturities. Both of these factors will result in a safer bond investment.
<span>Supply is the quantity of a good or service that producers are willing and able to offer for sale at various prices. </span><span>The two conditions that must be met in order there to be supply of a product are:
1. Buyers must be willing for it
2.Buyers must be able to pay for
</span>The Law of supply states that <span>as the price of a good or service increases, the quantity supplied increases, and vice versa.</span>
