A company might want to go for an open office layout because they want to foster creativity and collaboration
See the explanation bellow
<h3>The reason companies choose an open office layout</h3>
Although this type of layout has its own disadvantages one especailly is dealing with a noisy work floor, however, its has proven to be more advantageous in that it promotes collaboration and good work culture among staffs and co-workers.
In recent times, the agile method of product delivery suggests the open work floor as against the cubicle type of office space because it works best in a fast pace working environment.
Learn more about open office layout here:
brainly.com/question/2619283
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
If these two companies were to behave as individual profit maximizers, both company will advertise regardless of whether the other company advertises or not because their goal primary goal is to increase the profit and domination of the market.
Answer:
-0.33
Explanation:
The calculation of the price elasticity of demand using mid point formula is shown below:
= (change in quantity demanded ÷ average of quantity demanded) ÷ (percentage change in price ÷ average of price)
where,
Change in quantity demanded is
= Q2 - Q1
= 80 units - 100 units
= -20 units
And, the average of quantity demanded would be
= (80 units + 100 units) ÷ 2
= 90 units
Change in price is
= P2 - P1
= $2 - $1
= 1
And, the average of the price is
= ($2 + $1) ÷ 2
= 1.5
So, after solving this, the price elasticity of demand is -0.33
Answer:
I would say safekeeping of employees and guests, as well as eliminating probable threats.
Explanation:
Answer:
Projects A,B,C,D and E should be accepted
Explanation:
Based on the fact that each of the itemized projects has the same of level of risk as the company's existing assets, we suggest that the firm undertake those projects that gives a return rate which is above the current weighted average cost of capital of 10.5%
In essence,projects A,B,C,D and E should be accepted as they 12%,11.5%,11.2%,11% and 10.7% returns on investment respectively.
Projects F& G would be rejected on the premise that their rates of return are lower than what is currently obtainable in Midwest Water Works.