Answer: It had a History of Protecting Slavery and Segregation – This is often cited as one of the main detriments of the system of federalism that we have in this country, that since slavery was a state issue, it was something that could not be removed on the national level.
It Allows for Inequalities Between Different States – For example, instead of education funding throughout the country being the same, since it is a state issue, some states will spend more, per capita, on education than other states, causing what could be considered a disparity. The same goes for other things, as well, such as taxes, health care programs, and welfare programs.
The Blockage of Nationalist Policies by States – States can fight against the existence of certain national laws by challenging them in court, or going out of their way to not enforce those national laws, or even deliberately obstructing enforcement of national laws.
Racing to the Bottom – One argument given is that states will compete with each other in an oppositional way, by reducing the amount of benefits they give to welfare recipients compared to, say, a neighboring state, motivating the undesirables to go to the neighboring state, thereby reducing their welfare costs even more. This reduction of state benefits to needy has been deemed the ‘race to the bottom.’
Hi! Resources are a stock or supply of money, materials, staff, and other assets that can be drawn on by a person or organization in order to function effectively. I hope this helped, Goodluck :)
Answer:Scipio
Explanation: Scipio joined the Roman against the Carthage at young age in the first year of the Second Punic War when his father was consul. He survived a war called Cannae where his father in-law to be was killed .
After the battle of Cannae, Scipio and Appius Claudduis the commanded 10,000 survivors.
On hearing that Lucius Caecilius Metellus and many young nobles were running to go overseas to serve some king, Scipio came to the meeting, and at sword-point, forced all present to swear that they would not abandon Rome.
Answer:
Consequential damage
Explanation:
Consequential damage is the damages that are specific and that damages are not occurred due to an incident but occurred by the consequences of an incident.
For example, a car drive met with an accident when seeing another car accident during passing the second car. so we cannot say that the second car is responsible for the first car accident. It is the indirect result of the first car accident.
We can say that it is a result of indirect consequences.
<u><em>Types of consequential damages are;
</em></u>
