For France, the <em>American Revolution </em>implied a significant expenditure and the worsening of the crisis of the former regime. Six years after the <em>American Revolution</em> concluded, the <em>French Revolution</em> erupted in 1789, France was immerse in a profound economical and social crisis. Since France helped America economically and militarily during the American Revolution, it became insolvent; in other words, The American Revolution conducted France into a massive fiscal crisis, factor that was relevant in the French Revolution.
Also, the American Revolution's ideas of liberty and self- government inspired the French citizens and encouraged them to rebelled against the monarchy, due to the fact that by the time they were starving, insolvent and under a repressive ruler. French citizens saw Americana as an example to follow; the Americans imparted a working model of revolutionary success that the French adapted to their needs and context. French revolutionaries established constitutional measures in the <em>French Revolution</em> quite early, they also passed The Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen, and forced for a reformed monarchy.
Generally speaking, it would be "a mill worker from Pennsylvania" who would most likely support Andrew Jackson, since Jackson was famously an advocate for the "common man".
Answer:
they feared the threat of an attack by the Allied forces.
Explanation:
If they had not feared the threat of attack, they would not have signed the deal that crippled their government.
I think that the reason why Federal Government attempted to return domestic policy back to the states is because of efficiency.
It is more efficient to delegate powers to the states to deal with issues and conflicts within the states because state leaders can see firsthand on what these issues are and can immediately propose and act on solutions to resolve these issues.
There are 52 states in the U.S. of A and the Federal Government can only decide on laws that can be good for all. They can't individually monitor these states to see whether the laws are implemented as it should be. Thus, they need to delegate powers to the state to act in their behalf at the same time acting for the benefit of the people living in the state.
