A title can reveal many things about a story. A title may suggest a main idea or theme for text, or show some insight to a character that will be spoken about in the story. It could also introduce a symbol that the writing may follow or represent. A title is very influential to the reader because it it the first thing that they see, and it gives the first bit of information about what they will be reading. Some titles may have an entirely different meaning before you read a text versus after you read the text; therefore, it is important to analyze the title before and after reading a piece of writing.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer: an American activist in the civil rights movement best known for her pivotal role in the Montgomery bus boycott.
Explanation:
Answer:
c. Deductive, analogy
Explanation:
In this scenario, the argument being made would be classified as a deductive analogy. An analogy basically compares two things together in order to explain an idea, most of the time these two things have something in common that allows that idea to be better understood. In this scenario, they are comparing a rabid dog and an unexploded bomb. Since the unexploded bomb is the object that the rabid dog is being compared to it would be considered the conclusion, and since the conclusion is being applied first in the second part of the argument you are therefore using deductive logic.
The author word choice of using words like ardour and avidity made it clear that the gentleman got very much pleasure reading based on the definitions of the two words. In fact, it's not a great stretch to say he had an addiction since it got in the way of his basic needs which is what the first sentence was basically shouting at the reader. My interpretation is that the man was to much in his thoughts to take care of himself. From that I concluded that him trying to understand the absolute meaning of Don Belianis broke his fragile state; the only thing that keep the gentleman going was his joyful understanding of complex books, but he couldn't understand a author of a great book's writing.
The first answer has almost nothing to do with the original passage, the next 2 are just copies of the passage, the last answer deals with the passage yet also adds additional information making it the best paraphrase.