Answer:
<h2> Indus people settled</h2>
Answer:
My Car: I bought my car in 2015 from one of the local dealers. The Creditors can also use my car that currently as collateral. The car registration book has my name inscribed on it hence I own the vehicle. In the event of a need for credit, the creditors would lend me money worth the car. An attachment would occur when I sign the creditor’s contract with the bank in the condition of the car as the security.
My Land: Apparently I was deemed the legal owner of the land because I possessed an authenticated original title deed pertaining to the land with my name written on it. I signed the security agreement or the credit contract and as such the bank gained interest in the collateral hence attachment.
My AC: For the AC, a similar procedure has to happen in a secured credit transaction. Given that, I have all the receipts about the AC, I can use it as collateral. The creditors can lend an equivalent value to the AC. To seal the security agreement, I would sign the credit contract hence an attachment.
For each of the three items, explain if and when perfection occurred.
According to Distenfield & Distenfield (2005), the perfection of a security interest is the act of ascertaining one’s interest in a collateral hence preventing other parties from creating an attachment to the same collateral. Such parties would include other creditors and bankruptcy trustee among others. For the land, the creditor would perfect its interest by possessing the title deed pertaining to the land. Alternatively, the creditor would perfect its interest in the land collateral by filing a financial statement with the necessary public office. Just like the land, the creditor can possess the car's registration book hence perfection. Lastly, the creditor possesses the AC collateral hence perfecting in the collateral.
Explain the priority each of the creditors would have if you defaulted on your promise to pay
In an event of my failure to pay the already secured credit transaction, the creditor would obtain the collateral in lieu of the payment. The priorities of the creditors should only pick the items listed as securities and only those he or she has a security interest. For example, the creditor cannot take personal property or the home as collateral if it was not part of credit contractual agreement.
Explanation:
Townshend Acts was also referred to as Townshend Duties
- Let understand that Townshend Acts is an Act enacted in British by the Parliament passed in the year 1767 and 1768.
- The Townshend Act was enacted in 1767 and notably introduced new measures about collection of indirect taxes by the British officer in US colony.
- However, the colonist were continued to be angered because they knew it is an extension of the Stamp Act which they protested for as a result of increase in direct tax.
In conclusion, the colonist protested the against the Townshend Act because they felt the introduction will bring more hardship to the land.
Learn more about Townshend Acts here
<em>brainly.com/question/11623234</em>
The colonization period in Haiti was difficult, one of the hardest ones in all the Americas, the slavery was cataloged as the cruelest ever known, and the general live conditions for middle and lower classes were not good at all.
At the bottom of the social pyramid were the slaves, however the french soldiers had really hard duties on those times, they can be cataloged like <em>¨White slaves¨</em>, obviously they haven´t to perform the slave´s work, however duties turning around the slavery, extended shifts and dreadful life conditions made their work a difficult one.
So Haitian Slaves and French soldiers were technically in a similar spot, however, the slaves had survival and another kind of advantages over the French soldiers, a key point was the resistance or partial immunity to different diseases, unfortunately, that wasn´t the French´s case.
Yellow fever was a major issue to the French forces in Haiti, debilitated the army, and was one of the key points of the posterior events (the slavery and Haiti revolutions).
So definitely the two kinds of newcomers to Haiti, haven´t the same fate, the majority of slaves adapted quickly to new territory. the opposite happened to the French soldiers.
