Answer:
A. All applicants must pass a test. Claire is an applicant, so she must pass a test.
Explanation:
Deductive reasoning can be defined as a type of logical reasoning that typically involves drawing conclusions from one or more premises (factual statements) that are assumed to be true generally.
Basically, deductive reasoning starts with a general statement, idea or hypothesis (All applicants must pass a test; Claire is an applicant.) and reaches a specific logical conclusion (so she must pass a test.).
Hence, the option which is an example of deductive reasoning is; All applicants must pass a test. Claire is an applicant, so she must pass a test.
In conclusion, deductive reasoning is highly based on drawing an inference and reaching a logical conclusion from one or more premises. An inference is an act or process which typically involves a person deducing the meaning or message from something through induction.
Arthur Miller crafted The Crucible as an allegory by basing his characters off of real people that went through the Salem Witch Trials. Arthur Miller was called in during the Red Scare and was asked if he ever knew any Communists that threatened America. Miller felt attacked and wrote The Crucible to show how he saw the whole incident. He compared the experience to the court cases in the Witch Trials in which people were forced to betray their friends and family.
If that isn't enough, or what you are looking for, you can finish it, but I have to go so that's all I have right now.
Have a blessed day!
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning derives a general principle (you must water your garden daily) from a specific observation (gardens require a lot of water), connecting the two in a sequential and logical manner. It is the opposite of deductive reasoning, which uses a general principle to arrive at a specific observation (A could be seen as an example of deductive reasoning).
