1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rashid [163]
2 years ago
5

The commission engaged in a regular dialogue with the government of sudan throughout its mandate, in particular through meetings

in geneva and in sudan. based on a thorough analysis of the information gathered in the course of its investigations, the commission established that the government of sudan and the janjaweed are responsible for serious violations of international human rights and humanitarian law amounting to crimes under international law. in particular, the commission found that government forces and militants conducted, indiscriminate attacks, including killing of civilians, torture, enforced disappearances . . . and destruction of villages. . . . these acts were conducted on a widespread and systematic basis, and therefore may amount to crimes against humanity. . . . in their discussions with the commission, government of the sudan officials stated that any attacks carried out by government armed forces in darfur were for counter-insurgency purposes and were conducted on the basis of military objectives. however, it is clear from the commission's findings that most attacks were deliberately and indiscriminately directed against civilians. background information: this is an excerpt from an investigative report commissioned by the united nations. according to this passage, what is the government of sudan definitely guilty of? check all that apply. genocide deliberate attacks against civilians torture violations of international human rights crimes against humanity
History
1 answer:
Hatshy [7]2 years ago
6 0

Based on the findings of the commission, the government of Sudan is definitely guilty of:

  • Genocide
  • Deliberate attacks against civilians
  • Torture
  • Violations of international human rights
  • Crimes against humanity.

<h3>What is the relationship between the government of Sudan and the Janjaweed in Darfur?</h3>

The government of Sudan and the Janjaweed are allied in inflicting humanitarian disasters in Darfur.

Officially, the Janjaweed militia is recognized as the Rapid Support Force at the command of the National Intelligence and Security Services of Sudan.

Thus, the government of Sudan is definitely guilty of all the listed crimes.

Learn more about the government of Sudan and the Janjaweed at brainly.com/question/12320503

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Who was the first whig president
Oliga [24]
<span>George Washington is the answer.

</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
European exploration in the 15th and 16th century had a tremendous impact around the world especially in the Americas. Theses vo
blagie [28]

Response:

Technologies and arms are optimistic, while pathogens are the negative influence of Europeans on America's future.

Explanation of:

The positive influence of Europeans on the future of the Americas was that they introduced technology, weapons, cattle, plants, etc. to America. They also also brought Christianity to the people of America. The detrimental effect of Europeans was the introduction of deadly diseases such as smallpox, syphilis and measles, etc., which destroyed a huge population of America due to lack of defense mechanisms, since these diseases were foreign to them.

8 0
3 years ago
Who wrote the lliad and the odyssey
belka [17]
Homer wrote the Iliad
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I NEED HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jeyben [28]

Answer:

C. Representative Democracy

Explanation: Representative democracy, AKA as indirect democracy or representative government, is a type of democracy founded on the principle of elected officials representing a group of people, as opposed to direct democracy.

8 0
3 years ago
How did John Brown affect the militia system in the South?
Ivenika [448]

John Brown was an abolitionist who believed that military means would bring an end to the slavery

Explanation:

He was involved in the conflict that arose during the time of bleeding Kansas. There was a huge conflict among the people whether Kansas must be a free or a slave state and the conflicts that arose thereafter turned violent. John brown was an American adversary who believed that slavery can be terminated through violent means and killed five civilians who supported slavery.  

This was considered controversial as he resorted to the violent means to end slavery. Only a few slaves and African Americans supported John Brown, later the revolution which is led by him lost its significance. Though he was considered to be a martyr in abolishing slavery he was also considered to be a villain as he resorted to the killing and murdering people who supported slavery.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do you think calvinist ideas spread beyond geneva?
    12·2 answers
  • How did the radio help create common culture in the united states
    5·1 answer
  • Can some one help out
    10·1 answer
  • What river runs through connecticut and massachusetts?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the key difference between federal government and a confederate government
    9·1 answer
  • Help Quick!! This land [of South America] is very pleasing, full of an infinite number of very tall trees which never lose their
    15·2 answers
  • the real question is.... What and how does this Primary source connects to a modern theme, event or trend? I need ideas on how c
    6·1 answer
  • What reputation did Emma as Charles Mayberry have in Louisville?
    9·1 answer
  • Somebody help me so I can give y’all some points
    14·1 answer
  • Question 2 of 5
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!