European countries expanded their empires by establishing colonies in africa so they could exploit and export africa’s resources, they also wanted to protect trade routes
Both sides had very opposite views of the constitution- the federalist advocated for a strong central government with a national bank while the Anti Federalist believed this would give the central government too much power. In order to compromise the bill of rights was created which stated the rights of the people and the states. The federalist didn’t believe this was necessary because the constitution already stated the states rights, but the anti federalist were not going to budge unless the bill of rights was included. The Great compromise was also created to account for the slaves in the south. The south believed that they should have more representation in the congress due to the higher population when including the slaves than the north. To compromise every 5 slaves counted for 3 citizens, This was called the three-fifths compromise. This rule applied for the House of Rep where the amount of congressmen per state was based on population (favored by the south) , while the senate only allows 2 senators per state (favored by the north).
hope this helps :)
Answer:
Manifest Destiny, an express coined in 1845, is the thought that the Joined together States is destined—by God, its advocates believed—to extend its domain and spread popular government and capitalism over the whole North American landmass. The reasoning drove 19th-century U.S. regional development and was utilized to legitimize the constrained expulsion of Local Americans and other bunches from their homes. The quick extension of the Joined together States escalates the issue of subjugation as unused states were included to the Union, driving to the flare-up of the Civil War.The fundamental cause of the war was the affirmation of Texas into the United States of America. Since Mexico did not recognize Texas's independence after its useful rebellion against the Mexican government it was seen as an intrusion into the Mexican region once Texas acknowledged the welcome into the United States.
I hope this helps.
Answer:
Criticizing the government was considered unpatriotic in the United States during World War I
Explanation:
During the World War I, government were taking many steps to engaged people and distracting them the war activities. The federal government put forth several different laws/campaigns to increase patriotism. This include food rationing campaigns, encouraging women to join the work force which were taking by the people as negative activity of the government.
This war lasted for about 52 months and it was a life-changing experience for the generation of that time.
Answer:
Explanation:
Essay Segment or Quote Rubric Rating Comments
Briefly describe ONE major difference between Nash’s and Maier’s historical interpretations of the origins of the American Revolution.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Nash’s argument.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Maier’s argument.
3
2
1
The response to (a) did not earn a point because it is does not adequately describe the arguments of Nash and Maier. It merely lists the idea that Maier believed the Revolution emerged from old ideas, and Nash believed the Revolution was based on new ideas.
The response to (b) earned 1 point by providing evidence that the Boston Tea Party was a specific event that demonstrated the colonists’ rebellion against Great Britain’s taxation, which supports Nash’s argument. The response to
(c) did not earn a point because the Boston Massacre does not support Maier’s argument that the Revolution originated from earlier revolutionary thought.
