Answer:
I think it is B, but it could be C. Im pretty sure it's be. i hope im right and that this helps you.
With the influx of people to urban centers came the increasingly obvious problem of city layouts. The crowded streets which were, in some cases, the same paths as had been "naturally selected" by wandering cows in the past were barely passing for the streets of a quarter million commuters. In 1853, Napoleon III named Georges Haussmann "prefect of the Seine," and put him in charge of redeveloping Paris' woefully inadequate infrastructure (Kagan, The Western Heritage Vol. II, pp. 564-565). This was the first and biggest example of city planning to fulfill industrial needs that existed in Western Europe. Paris' narrow alleys and apparently random placement of intersections were transformed into wide streets and curving turnabouts that freed up congestion and aided in public transportation for the scientists and workers of the time. Man was no longer dependent on the natural layout of cities; form was beginning to follow function. Suburbs, for example, were springing up around major cities
The answer would be A, The Colosseum.
They are valuable for the appointive procedure. The two gatherings fill in as a quite decent method for getting similarly invested individuals together. In the event that they were not there, it would be substantially harder to distinguish great competitors, motivate them to keep running for office, bolster them.
They fill in as a contradicting element to the intrigue gatherings. In the event that it were not for parties, the intrigue gatherings would be unopposed. The gatherings attempt to pull individuals together in expansive coalitions. The intrigue bunches attempt to pull them separated on single issues.
