Answer:
Insurance is the procedure by which persons or companies exposed to a specific risk agree with an institution specializing in compensation for damage that the institution will indemnify the damage caused when the risk materializes. The resulting contract is called insurance.
From a commercial point of view, insurance can be defined as the means by which the cost of incidental damage can be converted evenly into a continuous annual cost on an annual basis.
Answer:
D. Preferred stockholders are allocated their dividends before dividends are allocated to common shareholders.
Explanation:
Before declaring dividend on common shares, it is always necessary for the company to pay dividends on preferred shares and dividends are declared when there are sufficient profits.
This implies that the work would take longer as well, making the product cost more
Answer : coefficient of determination.
In the regression analysis results on MS excel the SSR/ SS total is called as " coefficient of determination"
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
