1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sveta_85 [38]
2 years ago
7

Historically, the Roman civilization followed what political evolution?

History
1 answer:
AleksandrR [38]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Kingdom, Republic, Empire

(The Period of Kings (625-510 BC), Republican Rome (510-31 BC), and Imperial Rome (31 BC – AD 476)).

<h2>How was the political structure of the Roman Republic/Empire?</h2>

Depending on whichever time you choose to observe, the system of the Roman Empire changes. A different group known as the Etruscans dominated the Romans at the beginning of their history. It was a monarchy throughout this time period.

However, the romans conquered the etruscans in 509 B.C., and as a result, they abhorred anything connected to their foreign overlords. As a result, they established a republic that had some degree of democracy. It was run by a senate made up of Rome's 200 richest families, and the only time a dictatorship was supported was in the event of a serious emergency like war or widespread hunger. Then the senate would choose a dictator who would be given six months to reign before stepping down. These two individuals, who were chosen to serve as the republic's consuls for a year, held the potential to seize brief dictatorship. It lasted for centuries and was known as The Roman Republic.

Nevertheless, it started to deteriorate in 49 B.C. when Julius Ceaser declared himself to be a lifelong ruler. However, in 44 B.C., senators assassinated him. Following it, it first appeared as though The Roman Republic had been rescued.

But that wasn't the case. Octavius (Augustus), Julius Ceaser's adoptive son, was chosen to serve as a republican consul. Later, the Roman Republic was replaced by the Roman Empire in 31 B.C. after Octavius triumphed in a civil war. A monarchy was founded in this system, and the first Emperor was Octavius, who was given the honorific name Augustus in 27 B.C. It remained an empire and a monarchy after that.

One last point to be made about the system is that the church gained more sway in politics when Constantine the Great made Christianity the official religion of Rome.

Therefore, in conclusion to this, Rome mainly had two political systems throughout their time in existence, The Roman Republic and The Roman Empire.

#SPJ2

You might be interested in
Which leader of the Scientific Revolution in England promoted the idea that science must rely on repeated observation and experi
nikitadnepr [17]
I would believe your answer is <span>A. Isaac Newton</span>
3 0
3 years ago
1Which situation at the beginning of the 20th century is most clearly illustrated by the notice above?
kkurt [141]

At the beginning of the 20th century, <u>Many </u><u>people </u><u>had held </u><u>feelings </u><u>of </u><u>nativism</u><u>. </u>

Nativism:

  • Is a belief that those born in a place should have more rights and opportunities than immigrants.
  • Was very popular in the U.S. in the beginning of the 20th century.

People who supported nativism believed that immigrants such as the Chinese and Eastern Europeans, were taking up all the jobs and opportunities and so they wanted immigration to reduce.

In conclusion, option c is correct.

<em />

<em>Find out more about </em><em>nativism </em><em>at brainly.com/question/4288885. </em>

5 0
3 years ago
Thomas Jefferson supported the French against the British because
nexus9112 [7]

Thomas Jefferson, as the American Minister to the Court of Versailles, witnessed the opening chapters of the French Revolution in the late 1780s. In September 1789, he returned to the United States, but, assuming the position of Secretary of State, he continued his involvement in American foreign policy. The French Revolution, continuing into the 1790s, would have an ongoing effect on Jefferson's career.

Thomas Jefferson had been living abroad for four years when political unrest began to heighten in France. Throughout 1788, he watched events unfold and described the state of affairs with optimism, noting the bond between America its Revolutionary War ally, France: "the nation has been awaked by our revolution, they feel their strength, they are enlightened, their lights are spreading, and they will not retrograde."1 To James Madison, Jefferson expressed the cautious hope that the French were "advancing to a limited, moderate government, in which the people will have a good share."2

Acknowledging his support for the revolutionary cause, Jefferson's French friends — the aristocratic reformers — turned to him for advice. In the spring of 1789, the Marquis de Lafayette suggested that Jefferson outline his recommendations for them in written form. The latter accordingly drafted a "charter of rights" that might be issued by Louis XVI. The proposal — an accommodation among the king, the nobility, and "the commons" — was intended as an introductory step toward a constitutional monarchy;3 but nothing came of Jefferson's suggested compromise, a "lamentable error" from his point of view.4

Throughout the spring, Jefferson attended sessions of the Estates General and listened to the debates. "[T]hose of the Noblesse were impassioned and tempestuous," he remembered, and "the debates of the Commons were temperately rational and inflexibly firm."5 Early in July 1789, Lafayette presented the newly-formed "National Assembly" with the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen — a document that he had produced with the help of his friend Jefferson.6 Events were moving at a rapid pace.

When French revolutionaries violently stormed the "Bastille" in mid-July, Jefferson was taken aback by the "astonishing train of events."7 By August, however, he was ready to defend the actions of the mob, noting that he had observed their behavior daily "with my own eyes in order to be satisfied of their objects, and declare to you that I saw so plainly the legitimacy of them." He was certain too that the French National Assembly had proceeded through adversity with "firmness and wisdom," and he maintained "the highest confidence" in the Assembly's ability to govern.8 Just as the revolutionaries were becoming more radical, Jefferson was becoming more radical as well.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Explain 3 reasons why the Pearl Harbor attack could ultimately be deemed a pyrrhic victory.
Nataly_w [17]

Answer:

The attack on Pearl Harbor was a surprise peacetime attack by the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Force on December 7, 1941, to the United States' Pacific fleet, which was anchored in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.

With the attack, the Empire of Japan expanded the Pacific War that had been waged since 1937. With the attack, Japan wanted to shut down the U.S. Pacific fleet for six months to secure raw materials in Southeast Asia.

On December 8, 1941, the United States declared war on Japan. This made the attack on Pearl Harbor and its aftermath a decisive turning point in World War II, because the United States' declaration of war on Japan and the Axis powers' declaration of war against the United States led to the United States' entry into World War II.

Although the attack weakened the United States significantly militarily, the long-term consequences for Japan were fatal. Through the attack, which was perceived as "insidious" in the USA, the American government succeeded in mobilizing the largely pacifist or isolationist US population to enter the war, which led to the decision in favor of the Allies due to the enormous American industrial potential.

In short, this attack was a Japanese pyrrhic victory, because on the one hand, it unleashed a new battlefront with a very powerful enemy; on the other, he was unable to fulfill his objective of completely destroying the American fleet; and lastly, he activated a series of diplomatic connections that took away even more international support from the neutral nations in the conflict.

3 0
3 years ago
How did the antifederalists look out for the "common man "
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

hcychc hcjc jvvjgviv jvufdv

Explanation:

ghuhb jjjcd hhfg

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the battle of Saratoga and French entrance into the war change British strategy?
    13·1 answer
  • In many colonies, slaves were encouraged to read and write <br><br> true <br> false
    8·1 answer
  • How were the aztecs able to build huge pyramid structures like the great temple at tenochtitlán
    12·1 answer
  • What challenges did the United States face during the Great Depression? Check all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • Rulers of the Holy Land
    12·1 answer
  • Did the boxer rebellion move China closer or further away from independence
    8·1 answer
  • W.E.B. DuBois advocated strongly for what societal status of African Americans in the United States at the turn of the century?
    15·1 answer
  • Who was chosen as leader of the US forces in Europe
    9·2 answers
  • What does Garvey believe to be the best way to achieve progress?
    12·1 answer
  • What prior knowledge is needed when following a recipe? a. a basic knowledge of cooking terms c. an understanding of the importa
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!