1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BigorU [14]
3 years ago
15

What does sugar act do

History
2 answers:
Dvinal [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Sugar Act reduced the rate of tax on molasses from six pence to three pence per gallon, while Grenville took measures that the duty be strictly enforced.

coldgirl [10]3 years ago
5 0
Sugar Act, also called Plantation Act or Revenue Act, (1764), in U.S. colonial history, British legislation aimed at ending the smuggling trade in sugar and molasses from the French and Dutch West Indies and at providing increased revenues to fund enlarged British Empire responsibilities following the French and Indian War. Actually a reinvigoration of the largely ineffective Molasses Act of 1733, the Sugar Act provided for strong customs enforcement of the duties on refined sugar and molasses imported into the colonies from non-British Caribbean sources.
You might be interested in
After World War II the United States occupied Japan and replace it imperial government with
Aloiza [94]

Marxism–Leninism is one of the main communist ideologies. It was the official state ideology of the Soviet Union and other ruling parties of the Eastern Bloc as well as the Communist International after Bolshevisation.[1] The goal of Marxism–Leninism is the transformation of a capitalist state into a one-party socialist state, commonly referred to by Western academics as communist state,[2][3][4][5] to establish the dictatorship of the proletariat.[6] This would be achieved by a revolution led by a vanguard party, who would be organized hierarchically and make decisions through democratic centralism.[7][8][9] The state would control the economy and means of production,[10] promote collectivism in society, suppress political dissent[9][10] and pave the way for an eventual communist society which would be both classless and stateless.[7] Marxist–Leninists generally support internationalism and oppose capitalism, fascism, imperialism and liberal democracy. As an ideology, it was developed by Joseph Stalin in the late 1920s based on his understanding and synthesis of both orthodox Marxism and Leninism.[11] Today, Marxism–Leninism is the ideology of Stalinist and Maoist political parties and remains the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam.[7]

After the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1924, Marxism–Leninism became a distinct philosophical movement in the Soviet Union when Stalin and his supporters gained control of the party. It rejected the common notions among Western Marxists of world revolution, as a prerequisite for building socialism, in favour of the concept of socialism in one country. According to its supporters, the gradual transition from capitalism to socialism was signified by the introduction of the first five-year plan and the 1936 Soviet Constitution. The internationalism of Marxism–Leninism was expressed in supporting revolutions in other countries (e.g. initially through the Communist International or through the concept of socialist-leaning countries after de-Stalinisation). By the late 1920s, Stalin established ideological orthodoxy among the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks), the Soviet Union and the Communist International to establish universal Marxist–Leninist praxis.[12][13] In the late 1930s, Stalin's official textbook History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks) (1938) popularised the term Marxism–Leninism among communists and non-communists.[14]

Marxism–Leninist philosophy has been criticised by a broad political spectrum both on the left and right. Marxist–Leninist rule has been especially criticised, including by other socialists such as anarchists, communists, democratic socialists, libertarian socialists and Marxists. Marxist–Leninist states have been described as authoritarian, or accused of being totalitarian, for enacting repressions and killings of political dissidents and social classes (so-called "enemies of the people"), religious persecution, ethnic cleansing, forced collectivisation and use of forced labor in concentration camps.[15][8][16] Such states have been accused of genocidal acts in China, Poland and Ukraine.[17][18][19][20] Anti-Stalinist left and other left-wing critics see it as an example of state capitalism[21][22] and have referred to it as a "red fascism" contrary to left-wing politics.[23][24][25] Other leftists, including Marxist–Leninists, have criticised it for its repressive state actions while recognising certain advancements such as egalitarian achievements and modernisation under such states.[26][27] The socio-economic nature of Marxist–Leninist states has also been much debated, varyingly being labelled a form of bureaucratic collectivism, state capitalism, state socialism, or a totally unique mode of production

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
________ was Hitler's last ditch counter-offensive to break the Allies push from France.
Feliz [49]
Battle of the bulge is the answer
8 0
4 years ago
Can someone help !!!!!!!!!!
kolezko [41]

Answer:

i  dont know but i think that u should be able to look it up

3 0
2 years ago
One advantage of a corporation over an individually owned business is that the corporation has
Usimov [2.4K]
The chief advantage that most publicly traded corporations enjoy – and the primary reason why private companies decide to go public<span> – is greater access to financing through capital markets. Public corporations can also protect their owners and managers from many legal liabilities, although some privately owned companies can accomplish this as well. Corporations with stock on listed exchanges can also offer stock options to employees, improve their brand equity and receive a form of complimentary advertising.</span><span>


</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans people should be legally protected from discrimination.
maria [59]

Answer:

I strongly agree ! It is not others people's choices to decide who people like or identify as ! Discrimination is not a good thing in any way

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Compared with supporters of federalism, supporters of states’ rights wanted
    11·2 answers
  • How did President Truman handle the striking railroad workers?
    13·2 answers
  • According to the lesson, which international event did NOT happen in 1947? Truman Doctrine National Security Act Marshall Plan c
    7·1 answer
  • What role did leadership play in the rise and fall of the west african kingdoms
    12·1 answer
  • Define proposed. List several synonyms.
    6·1 answer
  • Where does most of the federal government's money come from?
    7·2 answers
  • Realizo un breve comentario sobre la situacion actual de los derechos celectivos y sociales en nuestro pais
    6·1 answer
  • Who is William Lloyd Garrison and what did he do? (Explain with your own words)
    10·2 answers
  • Early Greeks lived by<br> a. fishing<br> b. trade<br> c. herding goats and sheep.<br> d all of these
    9·2 answers
  • 1. In a capitalist system, *
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!